You're right. I try to ignore the GRob hire.That was before Marrone hire.
He doesn't even tell the whole story. It wasn't GRob over pelini. 3 others got interviewed.
Henderson, Lewis and Gray.
But why wasn't Pelini part of that thoroughly lackluster group?
That's the damaging thing for Gross, IMO, from that article. Pelini wasn't good enough for here, but he was good enough for Nebraska? And based upon Gross's assessment, those four [including grob] were better candidates?
gross's ability to remember exactly what he said to cantor in the most flattering possible way is pretty amazingWhere gross recounts the firing of coach p and pelini's subsequent interest.
Gross's take makes it clear that firing p after the bowl game was not his idea.
I guess now that nancy is gone, it's okay for him to tell the story and rightfully throw her under the bus.
It's as if Gross is mocking the hiring process for some unknown reason.
Not his finest public moment.
quite possible.i don't think any of it matters. pasqualoni would've lost his job in 2005, that offense was going to blow ray rice or no ray rice with those QBs and WR. patterson was terrible with better receivers in 2004.
and gross would've still had to replace him and still would've screwed it up. yes, i know that this sounds self serving but that's how i think it would've played out
As long as we're doing hypotheticals--i don't think any of it matters. pasqualoni would've lost his job in 2005, that offense was going to blow ray rice or no ray rice with those QBs and WR. patterson was terrible with better receivers in 2004.
and gross would've still had to replace him and still would've screwed it up. yes, i know that this sounds self serving but that's how i think it would've played out
Things might have turned out better had we not gotten our doors blown off 51-14 to a 6 win team in a crap bowl game.
The timing was stupid but let's not cannonize P, either. All he had to do was beat friggin' Temple that year and his job would have been safe.
Temple.
Temple.
ugh.Things might have turned out better had we not gotten our doors blown off 51-14 to a 6 win team in a crap bowl game.
The timing was stupid but let's not cannonize P, either. All he had to do was beat friggin' Temple that year and his job would have been safe.
Temple.
Temple.
Things might have turned out better had we not gotten our doors blown off 51-14 to a 6 win team in a crap bowl game.
The timing was stupid but let's not cannonize P, either. All he had to do was beat friggin' Temple that year and his job would have been safe.
Temple.
Temple.
Like the one P was shownOf course, for the money SU would have received, we could have afforded some new doors.
Who were they?
RF2044 said:But why wasn't Pelini part of that thoroughly lackluster group? That's the damaging thing for Gross, IMO, from that article. Pelini wasn't good enough for here, but he was good enough for Nebraska? And based upon Gross's assessment, those four [including grob] were better candidates?
quite possible.
well, its also quite possible that we mightve not slipped so deep into the abyss.
with rice and courtney green and all the other NFLers, the next coach mightve had a better shot to not go 1 for a couple of seasons.
having P on double not-so-secret probation during a season of fielding phone calls from the Pelini's of the world, wouldve been preferrable to firing P after a bowl game and hiring guys based on how they did in their bowl game ...you know AD101...
Things might have turned out better had we not gotten our doors blown off 51-14 to a 6 win team in a crap bowl game.
The timing was stupid but let's not cannonize P, either. All he had to do was beat friggin' Temple that year and his job would have been safe.
Temple.
Temple.
gross still would've screwed it up.quite possible.
well, its also quite possible that we mightve not slipped so deep into the abyss.
with rice and courtney green and all the other NFLers, the next coach mightve had a better shot to not go 1 for a couple of seasons.
having P on double not-so-secret probation during a season of fielding phone calls from the Pelini's of the world, wouldve been preferrable to firing P after a bowl game and hiring guys based on how they did in their bowl game ...you know AD101...
i don't think any of it matters. pasqualoni would've lost his job in 2005, that offense was going to blow ray rice or no ray rice with those QBs and WR. patterson was terrible with better receivers in 2004.
and gross would've still had to replace him and still would've screwed it up. yes, i know that this sounds self serving but that's how i think it would've played out