Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="HoustonCuse, post: 1972894, member: 87"] In many ways a 5 and done is better than a 1 and done. The players are more mature and experienced, they have known expiration dates that aid in personnel planning, and you have fewer unknowns about what their actual performance will be. Some have seen reliance on these transfers as a weakness but in a world where players stay one or two years anyway, why would we care what the source is. Especially given that factor of you don't have the risk of getting surprised like Ennis and Mali. For instance, does anybody think that QG would have been substantially better than JG? [/QUOTE]