az.

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CardiacCuse, post: 5766380, member: 6979"] false dichotomy theres plenty of 7 footers (and/or very tall centers 6'11 or wnatever) out there to grab...Su picked one up this portal season already and skilled as well...i really dont understand this argument that its either small ball center OR big goofy doofus center...we've seen mid majors with decent bigs...Su should be able to find some. i mean hofstra had really good bigs last year iirc and honestly if its really this dire in terms of being a bottom of the barrel school because of budgetary reasons then why even try? and furthermore, why would the school continuously put out PR that NIl isnt a constraint for the potential of the team? i understand that the team has stunk for a while now...but im not resetting my expectations in terms of what the team can and should be just fundamentally disagree. the frountcourt SUCKED and the team consistently got extremely outscored in the paint...kyle avged 8 and 7. wow. dont get me started on suaore. its not "awesome" its tall. with skill. its not really that high of a bar. yes a lot of people did actually argue hegiht doesnt matter ...it does. just want to kill the small ball roster esp frontcourt idea...and im glad gmac agrees (based on the players he has targeted and added) well theres an absurd level of out of touch going on in many aspects around the team and this board definitely influences what the program and coaches do...so speaking up about that is important every single final four team had 7 footers and NONE of them played small ball...yet last year when i balked at kyle and suoare as the frontcourt everyone said small ball is the new thing. and they were wrong af theres no cycle of ncabb where tall centers are not an advantage...name 1 era where that happened. its not cyclical its immutable [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?