Here's an example of how to use TE's | Syracusefan.com

Here's an example of how to use TE's

GoSU96

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 17, 2011
Messages
21,609
Like
42,164
effectively with the most inaccurate is SU history (according to some at the time)





I don't see any Gronkowski's or Julius Thomas' running around out there.
 
My work computer won't let me see this. Is it there a youtube clip that can be copy and pasted?
 
Agree. We should surprise one team per season with it.

Otherwise, we were ranked 90th in Total Offense that year, nearly tipped the 350 mark per game.
 
My work computer won't let me see this. Is it there a youtube clip that can be copy and pasted?
it's a clip from Syracuse final win of the 2011 season on october 21

i'm looking for youtube videos for wins in the last 5 games but they've all been pulled from youtube, presumably for copyright reasons
 
My work computer won't let me see this. Is it there a youtube clip that can be copy and pasted?
https://www.youtube. com/watch?v=Z65sRj1dDmo


Copy and paste in your browser and remove the space between youtube. and com - I tried making it a link, but it embedded the video as in Go's OP.
 
the opponent didn't use any tight ends and had a horrible season only winning ten games and only scoring 70 in their bcs bowl game

i'm convinced. i'm left to wonder why we're limiting ourselves to just two tight ends at a time
 
it's a clip from Syracuse final win of the 2011 season on october 21

i'm looking for youtube videos for wins in the last 5 games but they've all been pulled from youtube, presumably for copyright reasons

It's an example that shows it can be very successful, hence the title.
 
It's an example that shows it can be very successful, hence the title.
it's also an example that shows it can be very unsuccessful

anything can be successful for one game
 
the opponent didn't use any tight ends and had a horrible season only winning ten games and only scoring 70 in their bcs bowl game

i'm convinced. i'm left to wonder why we're limiting ourselves to just two tight ends at a time

And since 2011 they've been 18-19, what's your point?
 
it's also an example that shows it can be very unsuccessful

anything can be successful for one game

And there were plenty of times the following year that it worked very well.
 
And since 2011 they've been 18-19, what's your point?
my point is that our offense sucked in 2011 and WVU's was good

2012, we had 3 good WR and we were good. let's keep doing that
 
my point is that our offense sucked in 2011 and WVU's was good

2012, we had 3 good WR and we were good. let's keep doing that

My guess is that they want to do both.

Pretty simple, you have the 2nd TE swap out for the third receiver when you want to change things up.

In other words what we saw here 10,11,12.

Plenty of three wide, phased out the FB except situationally over time, to the point where it was the base formation.
 
My guess is that they want to do both.

Pretty simple, you have the 2nd TE swap out for the third receiver when you want to change things up.

In other words what we saw here 10,11,12.

Plenty of three wide, phased out the FB except situationally over time, to the point where it was the base formation.
my guess is that it's going to be way more than a change up
 
Agree. We should surprise one team per season with it.

Otherwise, we were ranked 90th in Total Offense that year, nearly tipped the 350 mark per game.

We beat Notre Dame on the road in 2008, we should totally implement whatever system we were using that day.
 
effectively with the most inaccurate is SU history (according to some at the time)





I don't see any Gronkowski's or Julius Thomas' running around out there.
God that was fun. Much like when we watched that Missou game at the now defunct Quaker steak that night. Good stuff
 
Last edited:
Millhouse said:
my point is that our offense sucked in 2011 and WVU's was good 2012, we had 3 good WR and we were good. let's keep doing that

Shafer doesn't respect WVU's offense because he killed them most times we played them.
 
We beat Notre Dame on the road in 2008, we should totally implement whatever system we were using that day.

We had a line around the office for a guy (now thankfully no longer here) who we'd get motivated to do something productive one month, then that task would fall flat for about the next 11. We called him "Once in a row"

That's what I think of at times like this.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,355
Messages
4,886,689
Members
5,996
Latest member
meierscreek

Online statistics

Members online
40
Guests online
635
Total visitors
675


...
Top Bottom