How bad was the UCLA Pick?

[CaptainJ]

Yep - that is it exactly. He could have said the committee liked their entire body of work, they had some quality performances against good teams, they had a tough schedule. It would still not have been enough to let them in, but at least it would be within the parameters they are supposed to be working with.

He defends the UCLA pick on principles that have been dismissed for at least a few years (Eye test, Last 10). and then UCLA struggles in those same principles. Well I guess the Eye test can tell you whatever you want to hear.

I think the best "eye test" and "body of work" samples are in the "Who are you pulling for?" thread.