I guess we're doomed. | Syracusefan.com
.

I guess we're doomed.

Even iffff they were correct, it isnt about individuals. I've seen(and read) that this is a team, and that these guys play well with one another, and really like each other. And dont forget the HOF coach with more wins than any of the others remaining.
 
Why in the world would they even do such an irrelevant article. My goodness. If you want to take a shot at my "TEAM" - fine, but don't belittle individual players. Hopefully this will just be more motivation for us.
 
3.gif
 
Wow, really scraping the bottom of the barrel for story ideas at this point in the week. Kind of a mean-spirited one.
 
The best part though is that they acknowledge that Malachi is going to dominate college basketball next season and that the rest of D1 should be scared.
He's capable of getting on a heater and beating anyone, but the real scary thing is going forward that he might be a year away from really dominating the college game.
Expand...
Not bad for a rebuilding year.
 
I mean, it's tough to move them up much higher. Coleman should be last, no argument there.

Robey and Cooney should maybe move up a few slots, they're better than Meeks, Brunson, and definitely Lattin. Malachi should probably be ahead of Jackson. And Kris Jenkins is really underrated, as the 4th Nova guy? That guy is awesome and should be well ahead of Archie and Ochefu (6th???).

But hey CBS, "Thanks for the motivation"
 
That's it, I'm tossing all my SU gear and moving to Peru.

Seriously though, to illustrate just how lacking in insight - even irrelevant - the article is, it barely mentions Lydon whose play has been critical to SU's run. Whatever, talking heads gotta find something to talk about ...
 
Cowtown said:
That's it, I'm tossing all my SU gear and moving to Peru.

Seriously though, to illustrate just how lacking in insight - even irrelevant - the article is, it barely mentions Lydon whose play has been critical to SU's run. Whatever, talking heads gotta find something to talk about ...
Expand...

The Five Best..., The Ten Most Attractive..., The Eight Worst etc., etc., etc. Lists are proven click-bait. They don't have to make any sense. And usually they don't.
 
AccuRater said:
The Five Best..., The Ten Most Attractive..., The Eight Worst etc., etc., etc. Lists are proven click-bait. They don't have to make any sense. And usually they don't.
Expand...

But, it's six days between games this week ... :)
 
What is funny about these articles is that they inadvertently give credit to Boeheim. Basically he got a team of middle school level players to the Final Four. Either that or Tyler Lydon is Lebron and Frank Howard is Chris Paul. Think about where they would have Brogdon, Gill, and Perrantes on this list...
 
You can also write an article saying we have 3 of the best players left in the tournament.

You can only play 5 guys at a time and with hour long timeouts, depth isn't really an issue aside from foul trouble.

When we have 3 guys who could possibly be drafted, this year, in the first round. I'm not worried about what anyone tries to say about our talent. This team has grown up.. It just took the tournament to do so.
 
It's funny how everyone here is so sensitive about this stuff!
I think it's an interesting Look at our players. You really can't argue with any of the analysis as each one of the remaining teams besides us have been in the top 5 for most of the year!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,362
Messages
5,347,939
Members
6,236
Latest member
SaltyCity

Online statistics

Members online
53
Guests online
9,937
Total visitors
9,990
Totals may include hidden visitors.


Top Bottom