I would hope there would be a federal investigation. Giving them the ball on that last possesion on an overturn was criminal.
How is blatantly shoving a defender away with your off hand a "phantom charge call"?so similar to mich-tenn.
the ball clearly went off tenn player (easily seen live), they call it tenn ball, go to replay and the replay clearly shows off of tenn player and they keep it tenn ball.
a few seconds later tenn gets called for a phantom charge (although the call gave them a chance. if you watch the replay - if there wasnt a charge - the ball was stolen and mich would have possibly been able to run out clock).
last night
a phantom charge call.
2 seconds later
a 50-50 ball and a 50-50 replay but they give it to ariz (from my opinion the right call... but you CANT overturn based on that evidence).
How is blatantly shoving a defender away with your off hand a "phantom charge call"?
Not sure what you mean. Thought it was an obvious offensive foul. However, I thought they should have called the bump by the Wisconsin player that led to the push-off.i really hope you are being sarcastic.
and because of that, I thought it should have been a play on. Contact from both players, and he got an open although off balance shot, so let the play determine the outcome, not the whistle.Not sure what you mean. Thought it was an obvious offensive foul. However, I thought they should have called the bump by the Wisconsin player that led to the push-off.
Ball handler extended his arm AFTER the defender initiated the first contact which, if any call was made, should have been a foul and resulted in a 1-and-1. The best situation would have been a no call since the 2nd contact wasn't any more of an advantage than the first contact. And I didn't care who won the game.How is blatantly shoving a defender away with your off hand a "phantom charge call"?