Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="orangecuse, post: 4845385, member: 668"] Agree with much of your sentiment. The last part, however, IMO, has at least as much, and arguably far more, to do with the poor leadership of the university at the time. Those stewards did quite a poor job in reinvesting into the program, etc., as I realize you're aware. I mean, Marrone begged and pleaded for an IPF when we were already a day late and a dollar short. The brass at the time basically told him, yeah, some day. If I recall correctly, it wasn't too long after Marrone left, where SU suddenly had the funds available to build it. Who knows, but again, IMO, perhaps this (along with other infrastructure shortcomings, etc.) played the most significant role(s) in a roster not being positioned for sustained success. [/QUOTE]