If you all want to fire an OC

[Dcuse]

The Rutgers guy should be at the front of the line. What the hell was that? He ran three different times on 3rd and long. Their run game gained about 1.5 yards per carry and they run on 3rd and 8.

 

[orangenirvana]

The Rutgers guy should be at the front of the line. What the hell was that? He ran three different times on 3rd and long. Their run game gained about 1.5 yards per carry and they run on 3rd and 8.

They won, didn't they?

 

[ImperialOrange]

They were killing the clock the entire game

 

[MaxwellCuse]

While I wouldn't trade Hackett for Dave Brock or George DeLeone that's not saying much.

 

[Dcuse]

They won, didn't they?

Oh yah. They won. Put this guy in charge of the Oregon offense. Are you kidding me?

 

[orangenirvana]

Oh yah. They won. Put this guy in charge of the Oregon offense. Are you kidding me?

I'm sure it was Flood's call to kill the clock the entire 4th quarter. They know our offense blows. Didn't want their 19 year old QB doing anything stupid. Too conservative for my taste, but nothing to do with their OC (whoever he is).

 

[Dcuse]

I'm sure it was Flood's call to kill the clock the entire 4th quarter. They know our offense blows. Didn't want their 19 year old QB doing anything stupid. Too conservative for my taste, but nothing to do with their OC (whoever he is).

3rd and long when you're trying to hold the ball and win the game and !!!3!!!! times you run the ball against a line you can't budge and that has nothing to do with their OC? You agree with that?

 

[Scooch]

So their guy is as bad as ours.

Hooray! I feel better.

 

[KaiserUEO]

3rd and long when you're trying to hold the ball and win the game and !!!3!!!! times you run the ball against a line you can't budge and that has nothing to do with their OC? You agree with that?

Yes.

For 2 reasons.

1. They won
2. You disagree with it, so it must've been the smart move

 

[Dcuse]

Yes.

For 2 reasons.

1. They won
2. You disagree with it, so it must've been the smart move

Now that you all see who disagrees -can you see the foolishness of these playcalls?

 

[JeremyCuse]

They just ran the ball because they knew our pop warner offense wouldnt put points up on the board. No need to move the ball when Nassib will simply turn it right back ov er to you deep in our own territory.

 

[Dcuse]

They just ran the ball because they knew our pop warner offense wouldnt put points up on the board. No need to move the ball when Nassib will simply turn it right back ov er to you deep in our own territory.

Oh, so they didn't want to hold onto the ball. My mistake. Actually, this guy is extremely inventive.

 

[JeremyCuse]

Oh, so they didn't want to hold onto the ball. My mistake. Actually, this guy is extremely inventive.

They had a two possession lead and offense couldnt score what did you think they were going to do, air it out? Come on man.

 

[Dcuse]

They had a two possession lead and offense couldnt score what did you think they were going to do, air it out? Come on man.

I don't know, maybe try and get A NEW SET OF DOWNS and give your defense 25 seconds of rest.

 

[rrlbees]

So their guy is as bad as ours.

Hooray! I feel better.

Just like the people who celebrated Marrone is better than Grob.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

 

[KILTKIKK]

Half the Rutgers fans hate the way we are so conservative on offense and just expect the defense to win games. The other half thinks flood is a genius. We use the same game plan with Conn and all games except Ark. You can not do it with Arkansas since they can scor at will like WV. Zi'm afraid of when we go against Louisville and Cinn.

 

[qdawgg]

It's amazing that people are missing Dcuse's point. Their offensive gameplan was terrible against a sh!tty team. They should have scored 30. Who cares if they won? Some of you used the same argument when we've beat crappy teams; you said "who cares if we barely won, we should have beat Stony Brook by more". Well duh, the same logic applies this week.

 

[Crusty]

In the last 2 1/2 years (2010, 2011 and 2012) we have averaged 22.2, 24.2 and 24.2 ppg respectively. That ranks us in the 80's ranking. Opponents have outscored us in two of the three years. Our O has sucked and that is not all on the players.

 

[Dcuse]

It's amazing that people are missing Dcuse's point. Their offensive gameplan was terrible against a sh!tty team. They should have scored 30. Who cares if they won? Some of you used the same argument when we've beat crappy teams; you said "who cares if we barely won, we should have beat Stony Brook by more". Well duh, the same logic applies this week.

I'm sorry but you miss my point. That team couldn't score thirty points on Fowler.Dude,we don't have a sh!tty defense,we have a good defense. My point is,on third and long when you have ZERO run game,you might want to try and complete a 7 or 8 yard pass to keep the clock moving and thereby increase your chances of holding your lead. This Rutgers team has the worst offense we've seen this year including Stony Brook.

 

[qdawgg]

I'm sorry but you miss my point. That team couldn't score thirty points on Fowler.Dude,we don't have a sh!tty defense,we have a good defense. My point is,on third and long when you have ZERO run game,you might want to try and complete a 7 or 8 yard pass to keep the clock moving and thereby increase your chances of holding your lead. This Rutgers team has the worst offense we've seen this year including Stony Brook.

That's what I said. Read it again.