...we could very easily be 8-2 right now. Gave away the NW, RU and Cin games and we were 5 points down, with the ball, at the end of the third quarter -vs- USC. Oh what could have been.
You must have watched a different game than I did. We dominated the line of scrimmage on both sides of the ball. Mistakes happen when you have a young team.I just don't think we gave away Cincy.
We were pushed all over the field- we could not stop the run.
Cincy made many mistakes and still won.
And we really didn't stop Minny either.
Rutgers was much more physical than we were- they created the TOs.
We should have beaten NW. No doubt. We gave the game away.
We should be 6-4 right now.
And we are on our way.
I just don't think we gave away Cincy.
We were pushed all over the field- we could not stop the run.
Cincy made many mistakes and still won.
And we really didn't stop Minny either.
Rutgers was much more physical than we were- they created the TOs.
We should have beaten NW. No doubt. We gave the game away.
We should be 6-4 right now.
And we are on our way.
Sorry, we pretty much dominated Rutgers in terms of the line of scrimmage and yardage. One of the "turnovers" wasn't a turnover. They did block that kick though. I'll give you Cinci and Minny, we just couldn't overcome the mistakes we made in those games.
can you ever admit you were wrong on something?Sorry.
I was there - I was basically on the field.
Trust me. We were beat up.
Rutgers put all sorts of pressure on our offense - the TOs were the product of Rutgers' physical play.
Sorry.
I was there - I was basically on the field.
Trust me. We were beat up.
Rutgers put all sorts of pressure on our offense - the TOs were the product of Rutgers' physical play.
can you ever admit you were wrong on something?
OPa ... what's your opinion on the first RU touchdown? You recall, since you were basically on the field, the one they fumbled into the end zone, which we recovered? I'm sure that was a result of their superior players too.Sorry.
I was there - I was basically on the field.
Trust me. We were beat up.
Rutgers put all sorts of pressure on our offense - the TOs were the product of Rutgers' physical play.
I agree. 7-3 tops if anything. We really gave away northwestern and we turned the ball over way too much against minny. The other games...meh. probably deserved to lose.I just don't think we gave away Cincy.
We were pushed all over the field- we could not stop the run.
Cincy made many mistakes and still won.
And we really didn't stop Minny either.
Rutgers was much more physical than we were- they created the TOs.
We should have beaten NW. No doubt. We gave the game away.
We should be 6-4 right now.
And we are on our way.
Not worth arguing with you about it. Game can't be replayed anyway. Glad to hear you were there on the field. Rutgers hospitality tent?Sorry.
I was there - I was basically on the field.
Trust me. We were beat up.
Rutgers put all sorts of pressure on our offense - the TOs were the product of Rutgers' physical play.
OPa ... what's your opinion on the first RU touchdown? You recall, since you were basically on the field, the one they fumbled into the end zone, which we recovered? I'm sure that was a result of their superior players too.
Eh, almost 200 yds more offense. They won on a kick block return and a short field TD. That game was a give away.
No, no he can not. Even when presented with hard evidence (see: betting lines thread a few wks back).
how about the stats that we were clearly more physical rushing and passing than Rutgers?
we out physicaled them to the tune of 200+ yards more
what about the BULLSHIT 'fumble' that was clearly not, that led to RU's last TD (difference in game)?
Ummm, Justin Pugh slipped and fell, had nothing to do with the imposition of strength.Uh, they blocked the kick. They imposed their strength on us and took advantage of what they do well.
We did not lose because of unforced errors.
one player - their Freeney ... GreeneUmmm, Justin Pugh slipped and fell, had nothing to do with the imposition of strength.
Obviously you listened to Flood when he mentioned (tongue-in-cheek) that he likes his WR's to exit the bus first because they're so physically impressive...which they are. But no way in hell is RU as physical as we are along the line of scrimmage. The only other RU unit I'd give that distinction to would be their LB corp.
Here's the deal. Your opinion is your opinion. It doesn't make it right.Oh, I see it was referees again!
Blaming losses on referees is a loser's game.
We lost because Rutgers was way more physical.
They did what you have to against Nassib. They put a lot of pressure on him and forced him into multiple TOs. They harassed him all game.
I know. I know. We are obligated to say on this board that Rutgers sucks. I know that if you say that Rutgers is a solid program you must be some kind of turncoat.
Regardless of that nonsense, on both sides of the ball Rutgers was bigger, stronger and faster. They were better. Accept reality and move on.
we're not,and shouldn't be based on the bad football we have played---no longer drinking the koolaid, EVERY WEEK THEY HAVE TO PROVE IT.--now and next year....we could very easily be 8-2 right now. Gave away the NW, RU and Cin games and we were 5 points down, with the ball, at the end of the third quarter -vs- USC. Oh what could have been.