I get what you're saying but I think you're taking my post a bit far. I think any number -- advanced metric or basketball card stat -- has to be taken in context so you avoid telling people Arinze was a terrific shooter. My point is that I think shot-blocking is very important in a defense that keeps it's center around the basket for the most part. Yes, I realize he has to be on a string at times and capable of effectively defending a player in the high post. And yes, I wish Etan denied the pass to the post a bit better and worked harder at positioning, but ultimately the guy was an absolute nightmare for most opponents. Plus, I'd argue that most shot-blockers tend to be fairly agile and quick off the floor -- things that help with the slides required in the zone.
Regardless, both were great defenders. I just tend to give the edge to Etan for a variety of reasons, not the least of which is spending basically a decade in the league largely for defense and rebounding. I see that as about as good a referendum on your defensive ability as anything.
