Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Capt. Tuttle, post: 2570103, member: 191"] If you read the story, it sounds like he was told by the health office he was good to go. [B][U]IF[/U][/B] true, can't blame the kid. Blame goes to both partners for not protecting themselves. Indiana's comaprative negligence statute is here. [URL='https://hensleylegal.com/articles/overview-indiana-negligence-law/']Overview of the Indiana Negligence Law - Hensley Legal Group, PC[/URL] I could see a jury finding the woman (as compared to him) to be at least half responsible, if not more, for not insisting that a condom be used. They could find 50% each, as well. STDs are a known risk, and precautions could have been taken by her, as there is no allegation of force. Will be interesting to see how the medical comes out. I am not sure she has legal standing to sue the medical staff. [/QUOTE]