it's Q time!

[pearl31]

nm

 

[OrangeXtreme]

 

[Trueblue25]

Quincy will be special imo

 

[Briancuse]

Quincy will be special imo

He's got to develop some range on his shot.

 

[Gabjon]

I'm going to leave this right here...


Credit to Jordville

 

[Trueblue25]

He's got to develop some range on his shot.

Has plenty of time this offseason, attainable goal

 

[007]

Has plenty of time this offseason, attainable goal

Attainable, maybe. Probable, highly unlikely. Q has a lot of work to do on his shot mechanics. It is not going to come with increased range, IMO.

Q is far better served by working on his inside and mid range game.

 

[sufandu]

Has plenty of time this offseason, attainable goal

But does he have access to a court?

 

[Trueblue25]

But does he have access to a court?

Maybe not these two weeks but I’m sure Syracuse Athletics will hook up their assets once legally allowed to

 

[Trueblue25]

Attainable, maybe. Probable, highly unlikely. Q has a lot of work to do on his shot mechanics. It is not going to come with increased range, IMO.

Q is far better served by working on his inside and mid range game.

Has decent mechanics imo, needs to fine tune. Think he’ll eventually be a CJ fair type on the baseline and key.

 

[OrangeDW]

I’ve got Q for 10-12 points and 7-8 boards next year.

Marek is the guy who needs to take his game to another level if we’re going to be good, IMO.

 

[RF2044]

I’ve got Q for 10-12 points and 7-8 boards next year.

Marek is the guy who needs to take his game to another level if we’re going to be good, IMO.

I think the scoring seems reasonable, he has the tools to do more, but that would represent quality production.

The rebounding seems low to me, given how he gobbled them up in limited minutes. Seems funny to say that about 8 boards per game, which would be terrific, but I think [emphasis on this being an opinion] he could prove to be more formidable on the glass.

I'd sign up for 13 and 8 right now. He's got the potential to do more, but I think he'll be our best PF in awhile in terms of low post scoring.

 

[Alsacs]

I think the scoring seems reasonable, he has the tools to do more, but that would represent quality production.

The rebounding seems low to me, given how he gobbled them up in limited minutes. Seems funny to say that about 8 boards per game, which would be terrific, but I think [emphasis on this being an opinion] he could prove to be more formidable on the glass.

I'd sign up for 13 and 8 right now. He's got the potential to do more, but I think he'll be our best PF in awhile in terms of low post scoring.

Player projections for next year.

 

[RF2044]

Player projections for next year.

I'd be pretty underwhelmed with 7 and 6 from Q if he was playing starters minutes [25+], to be honest.

 

[OrangeDW]

Player projections for next year.

Marek and Q will do more.

Sidibe won’t score quite that much.

3 of the bottom 4 guys won’t play in a lot of games so those modest “projections” can be re-distributed among the guys who do play.

 

[OrangeDW]

I'd be pretty underwhelmed with 7 and 6 from Q if he was playing starters minutes [25+], to be honest.

He did 7 and 5 this year, so...yeah.

 

[Alsacs]

I'd be pretty underwhelmed with 7 and 6 from Q if he was playing starters minutes [25+], to be honest.

Playing Girard/Buddy/Guerrier/Dolezaj together with a big will actually hurt Guerrier’s numbers as he won’t get shots outside of offensive rebounds.
He will be 3rd option at best with his lineup.
Dolezaj and Guerrier together at the spots actually restricts spacing. We become bigger and should do well rebounding with them together in the lineup.

 

[dasher]

Player projections for next year.

Those numbers mean less than nothing to me. No one knows anything about next year right now.

 

[Alsacs]

Those numbers mean less than nothing to me. No one knows anything about next year right now.

I am not telling you they are going to be 100% accurate.
Don’t care about them.
I find them to be interesting baselines for expectations.
The numbers are outlined and explained based on minutes projected, usage rate, and history from previous years.

 

[721Comstock]

I'd be pretty underwhelmed with 7 and 6 from Q if he was playing starters minutes [25+], to be honest.

Yeah - if he’s gonna be getting OSB minutes as a Soph, then hopefully he can put up OSB type #’s too.
Let’s split the difference in his 2 years and call it 13 & 8.

(Just not as atrociously inefficiently).

 

[RF2044]

Playing Girard/Buddy/Guerrier/Dolezaj together with a big will actually hurt Guerrier’s numbers as he won’t get shots outside of offensive rebounds.
He will be 3rd option at best with his lineup.
Dolezaj and Guerrier together at the spots actually restricts spacing. We become bigger and should do well rebounding with them together in the lineup.

I think it is likely that we might be more inside focused, if Q and Sidibe take the next steps. Ball goes inside, then out to shooters. I could definitely see Quincy in the top 3, but as more of a focal point. I don't see him as a guy who is only going to score on putbacks.

Besides, 7 ppg [which was basically his production this year, a season where he was inconsistent and garnered inconsistent minutes] is only 2 or 3 buckets and 2 or 3 free throws per game. He's already producing at that level as a freshman.

 

[pearl31]

I am not telling you they are going to be 100% accurate.
Don’t care about them.
I find them to be interesting baselines for expectations.
The numbers are outlined and explained based on minutes projected, usage rate, and history from previous years.

don't you maybe want to attribute the source of these projections?

 

[Alsacs]

don't you maybe want to attribute the source of these projections?

Verifying Browser...

www.barttorvik.com

No problem.

 

[pearl31]

Verifying Browser...

www.barttorvik.com

No problem.

thx

 

[Capt. Tuttle]

Attainable, maybe. Probable, highly unlikely. Q has a lot of work to do on his shot mechanics. It is not going to come with increased range, IMO.

Q is far better served by working on his inside and mid range game.

And FTs although there were good stretches to be sure