jncuse
I brought the Cocaine to the White House
- Joined
- Feb 19, 2012
- Messages
- 19,858
- Like
- 34,062
If RPI is meaningless as an wins"end" tool, why is it important as "means" tool?
If you can't base the bracket (with a straight face) strictly on RPI, then who cares how many top 50, 100, 200 RPI wins or losses a team has?
Precision..
If you are going to use RPI as the only means to rank individual teams then it matters greatly if your RPI is 42 or 49... and nobody expects or wants RPI to be the sole measuring stick.
If you are going to use it to group teams and your records against a group of teams, RPI doesn't have to be so precise for each team... it just needs to put teams in the right range. (of course it could be problematic right around the 50 range... but they seem to adjust for that by viewing wins over an at large team as a quality win)
Last edited: