Didn't read the article, but I don't agree with the claim made in the headline.
Boeheim's had bigger player replacement challenges in the past.
We lost a starting point guard and a bunch of scoring production from a team that couldn't get out of its own way during the last quarter of the season. That's not exactly like losing the core of very good, veteran teams in 1996, 2000, and 2005.
I'm sorry that we couldn't see Ennis develop in the manner of many equally (and even more) talented players before him, but I'm comfortable with what we've got. Talent-wise, we're looking at potential upgrades at two (arguably all three) starting positions; experience is nice, but it's no substitute for raw talent.