Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="jncuse, post: 4618632, member: 1969"]
[B]POST #2[/B]

There are 3 main flaws in your post

#1)  Poor application of the transitive party in a league (the "NCAA") of 6 or 7 main conferences.
Just because League A beat League B, it doesn't mean League A is better than League B because they both have to play League C,D,E,,G in several more games

#2)   The ACC/Big challenge was 14 games.
The ACC played 146 other OOC games.   The BIG played 138 other OOC games.
You are basing conclusions based on 14 games rather than everything else which is very problematic.
The data is out there and I have tracked it.

Thankfully the ACC did well in the BIG challenge otherwise the OOC would have been a total disaster.

#3) Your assumption that I don't know this stuff, and you do because I don't understand simple math.  Even though I have been tracking conference OOC for at least 15 years on various boards in November and December (do you want me to pull up old posts on here since I have been a member).  I fully understand the implications of your performance on RPI and NET before this.

Of course the NET is not perfect.   But its not just throwing out random garbage showing one league as much better than the other.  It generally tracks performance fairly well which I will show with actual data.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?