I just suggested someone new tutor our bigs, not replace or demote Hop.So we had the same big man coach for 35 years we have replaced him with a man who is 6" taller and 13 months you guys are looking to replacement because he is too short and played guard. This happens to be the same coach who is contractually obligated to be our Head Coach when JB retired. If he can't coach big men which is a ridiculous notice but let's assume it is true he will be our HC in the near future shouldn't be put in a position where he will learn as much as possible?
I just suggested someone new tutor our bigs, not replace or demote Hop.
That's fair, my point is we have a ton of great former bigs, why not use those resources?
That's fair, my point is we have a ton of great former bigs, why not use those resources?
Do you really think our current coaching staff doesn't do all of these things?
I know this sounds cliche' but JB didn't win 904 games without knowing how to use the resources he has available to him. If he thought he needed a tall coach to coach the big men we'd have one.
I posted something similar in another thread. I know some people on this board think Hop does a good job with our big men, but I'm of the opinion that having an actual "big man" coach our big men may be in order. Why not John Wallace?
He's retired. He was at Midnight Madness two years ago. He was at our game yesterday. He improved a great deal at Syracuse. He's played in Final Four pressure. He had a nice NBA career.
He's one of my favorite all-time Orangemen.
What say you?
please name some examples of good big men coaches who were big men? seriously do they exist?
We are also accustomed to seeing forwards not have breakout sophomore seasons-------JS among others.
AO coming in and working with the point guards is a silly comparison at best.
Because someone was good at his position does not mean he will be good teaching/supervising others like him. A great illustration in business is promoting your best salesman to sales manager. More often than not, a grand example of the Peter Principle. One step beyond their ability.
My point is Hop has been with the program, JB and Bernie long enough to do a good job with the big men. We're talking about coaching experience which the people sitting on the bench with JB have.
Big men's games are pretty basic, for the most part. Any competent coach should be able to teach the basics-medium level skills, regardless of what his position was or if he even played at a high level. VanGundy's were both mediocre low level players but very good NBA coaches.
Do you really think our current coaching staff doesn't do all of these things?
I know this sounds cliche' but JB didn't win 904 games without knowing how to use the resources he has available to him. If he thought he needed a tall coach to coach the big men we'd have one.
I did expect more from you than quoting a win total as some sort of proof that SU has a good bigs coach. It's not cliche, it's irrelevant. How do you know JB/Hop wouldn't like a different bigs coach? GMac was hired in the wake of the Bernie fiasco. The current staff seems way too guard heavy. Hop's emphasis should be on learning how to run the overall team, and recruiting, not learning how to teach the bigs. And it seems like that is what he has been doing to the expense of the bigs development. SU appears to be paying the short term price.Do you really think our current coaching staff doesn't do all of these things?
I know this sounds cliche' but JB didn't win 904 games without knowing how to use the resources he has available to him. If he thought he needed a tall coach to coach the big men we'd have one.