Jon Scheyer has agreed on a six-year contract extension through 2028-2029

[OrangeXtreme]

 

[capeorange]

Lol! As soon as Red's teams start kicking his azz on a regular basis they'll want him gone.
They better hope it's a small buyout.

 

[Eric15]

I know I’m supposed to hate Scheyer, and I want to, but I honestly don’t. Seems like a good guy who carries himself well.

 

[Orangezoo]

I know I’m supposed to hate Scheyer, and I want to, but I honestly don’t. Seems like a good guy who carries himself well.

Like Red he seems to have that player relationship element locked down

 

[sufandu]

I know it's a stupid thing, but don't they usually cite both parties when a contract is "agreed on" and when just citing the one party they say "agreed to?"

Sorry for the nit pick, but I live in a stupid area where people will say someone is "laying in the floor" when they mean "laying on the floor." And if you point it out, they honestly can't recognize the difference between "in" and "on."

 

[Bulldog04]

Might be unpopular but I actually like him. I’ve never heard one bad thing about him. He seems to be a very hard worker who is truly blessed to have the opportunity he has. Seems very much like Red and has that pride to work hard to make everyone proud. Duke is fine with me. Uconn and Hurley are not. But good for JS

 

[Orangezoo]

Might be unpopular but I actually like him. I’ve never heard one bad thing about him. He seems to be a very hard worker who is truly blessed to have the opportunity he has. Seems very much like Red and has that pride to work hard to make everyone proud. Duke is fine with me. Uconn and Hurley are not. But good for JS

Yeah he isn't like the typical dbag dukies of the past

 

[orange79]

Yeah he isn't like the typical dbag dukies of the past

Give him time.

 

[Orangezoo]

Give him time.

Must just be a late bloomer

 

[cto]

I know it's a stupid thing, but don't they usually cite both parties when a contract is "agreed on" and when just citing the one party they say "agreed to?"

Sorry for the nit pick, but I live in a stupid area where people will say someone is "laying in the floor" when they mean "laying on the floor." And if you point it out, they honestly can't recognize the difference between "in" and "on."

If you're going to nitpick, I will do you one better.

It is "lying on the floor," not "laying on the floor." "Laying on the floor" means you are constructing a floor on top of, for example, a foundation. A person lies down ... but he lays something else down.