A 6’7” emergency 5? That sounds very bad.For those keeping track here. Davis essentially fills the role we wanted Maliq to play next year. Solid backup 4…emergency 5.
A 6’7” emergency 5? That sounds very bad.For those keeping track here. Davis essentially fills the role we wanted Maliq to play next year. Solid backup 4…emergency 5.
Then I see why Maliq left.
As college senior I probably would have as not only was I media trained, I was mediaI'm sure you or I wouldn't have handled it well when we were college aged either.
My tweets during college were cringey to look back on. Can't imagine if more people had eyes on it.
A 6’7” emergency 5? That sounds very bad.
Patterson passing McLeod would low key be a huge boost for us next year. Would be a way for us to quietly and unexpectedly get much better. Also great for the future as he's a RS .Patterson might be ahead of McLeod
So if Maliq is interested in Duke in a role where he will likely get less playing time, how does that make sense? I guess if you are enamored about wearing the Duke jersey, getting more cash, or being on a team that can legitimately play for a championship, it makes sense. However, it doesn't appear to be about playing time if he goes to Durham.Then I see why Maliq left.
He's better than nothing???? High praise. Our coaches have watched a ton of film on the guy. If we don't trust them to make judgments on back up forwards, we might as well make a change right now.I feel like a lot of what he does isn't going to translate.
Watching his highlights, Davis looks really big. He bulls his way to success pretty frequently... But then you see that he's 6'7" 220. He isn't going to bull his way anywhere in the ACC.
He takes too many bad shots. I hate the off the dribble going backwards just inside the three point line prayers. He also isn't much of a shot e up shooter. Fortunately, he ain't be asked to take those shots at Syracuse.
Davis has decent handle, especial for a guy his size, but nothing spectacular. He didn't get usually get all the way to the basket. Instead he turns and backs his guy... Kind of reminded me of Billy Edelin with his below the basket over the shoulder dribble drive post up moves.
He sets a good pick, and receives the ball ready to score.
He is a pretty good passer, and in lesser leagues where he commanded a double team, he was good at finding the cutter to the basket. He ain't command double teams in the ACC.
I wonder if he'll be able to rebound in the ACC. I wonder if he'll be able to score.
I'm glad he's coming as a backup, because we didn't have one at all. He's still not really a PF in the ACC, imo.
Davis isn't going to replace Brown, maybe not even Carey, but he's better than nothing.
maybe not even Carey
Jake said that his role this year would have been PF off the bench and spot minutes at C. After what he was for this team last year, would you hang around?So if Maliq is interested in Duke in a role where he will likely get less playing time, how does that make sense? I guess if you are enamored about wearing the Duke jersey, getting more cash, or being on a team that can legitimately play for a championship, it makes sense. However, it doesn't appear to be about playing time if he goes to Durham.
Whatever, I'm now all in on Jyare! Welcome aboard young man!
Don’t miss interpret this as saying the jumps are the same but this is essentially what Jyare is doing. Each kid has different motivations, we should focus on what we have rather dwell on what we lost.So if Maliq is interested in Duke in a role where he will likely get less playing time, how does that make sense? I guess if you are enamored about wearing the Duke jersey, getting more cash, or being on a team that can legitimately play for a championship, it makes sense. However, it doesn't appear to be about playing time if he goes to Durham.
Whatever, I'm now all in on Jyare! Welcome aboard young man!
I think you answered your own question here.So if Maliq is interested in Duke in a role where he will likely get less playing time, how does that make sense? I guess if you are enamored about wearing the Duke jersey, getting more cash, or being on a team that can legitimately play for a championship, it makes sense.
Would you start him at C? Would you tell a 5* top-10 player sorry you're not starting? Would you take the only real established shooter out of the lineup?Jake said that his role this year would have been PF off the bench and spot minutes at C. After what he was for this team last year, would you hang around?
Did I say anything about what he was told? My comment was strickly from what Maliq's or anybody in his position might have been thinking or feeling after that hinted conversation.Would you start him at C? Would you tell a 5* top-10 player sorry you're not starting? Would you take the only real established shooter out of the lineup?
The front court was always going to be a challenging proposition with Freeman and Brown both in the fold
Fair enough. Usually I see things I like when I watch highlights. With Davis, I saw a bunch of stuff that we actively don't want guys to do, or stuff I don't think will work at Syracuse.He's better than nothing???? High praise. Our coaches have watched a ton of film on the guy. If we don't trust them to make judgments on back up forwards, we might as well make a change right now.
No Please give your opinions. I just think you were a bit harsh on a kid that is, hopefully, going to be a back up for us.Fair enough. Usually I see things I like when I watch highlights. With Davis, I saw a bunch of stuff that we actively don't want guys to do, or stuff I don't think will work at Syracuse.
That said, he's a backup, we didn't have one, and I'd much rather have a super senior who averaged 17-7 last year than a lightly recruited guy out of high school.
I'll keep my concerns to myself from now on.
Fair enough. Usually I see things I like when I watch highlights. With Davis, I saw a bunch of stuff that we actively don't want guys to do, or stuff I don't think will work at Syracuse.
That said, he's a backup, we didn't have one, and I'd much rather have a super senior who averaged 17-7 last year than a lightly recruited guy out of high school.
I'll keep my concerns to myself from now on.
Yup, a far cry from my normal pollyanna view.No Please give your opinions. I just think you were a bit harsh on a kid that is, hopefully, going to be a back up for us.
backup 5 ? what are you smoking?For those keeping track here. Davis essentially fills the role we wanted Maliq to play next year. Solid backup 4…emergency 5.
i mean, I agree but I would hope that none of this is pre-defined but simply based on performance.Great pickup for the role that was available.
Then you might be disappointed - Only 40% of his attempts last season came at the rim, and he shot 61% on those (similar to Starling, for comparison). And that was against smaller competition than he'll face in the ACC.i see him as a 3 who plays inside
thats what I just said lolThen you might be disappointed - Only 40% of his attempts last season came at the rim, and he shot 61% on those (similar to Starling, for comparison). And that was against smaller competition than he'll face in the ACC.
I see Davis's offensive potential as a driver who picks up fouls at a decent rate to take advantage of his good FT shooting. He can't be trusted to hit threes, but he can hit in the midrange, which could be helpful in pulling secondary defenders away from Lampkin and Freeman.
He is not at all big enough to play the 4, let alone the 5.
Then you might be disappointed - Only 40% of his attempts last season came at the rim, and he shot 61% on those (similar to Starling, for comparison). And that was against smaller competition than he'll face in the ACC.
I see Davis's offensive potential as a driver who picks up fouls at a decent rate to take advantage of his good FT shooting. He can't be trusted to hit threes, but he can hit in the midrange, which could be helpful in pulling secondary defenders away from Lampkin and Freeman.
He is not at all big enough to play the 4, let alone the 5.