That's a bold statement.Despite the Star ranking KJ is probably the least talented of the WRs I'm this class He was almost guaranteed to RS. So going to prep school should have minimal impact on his career if he gets here by January
I'm always amazed when a kid can't do the work to at least qualify. It's not as if you have to be at the top of your class.
You mind giving your rationale on this one? Without any proper explanation from you debunking his impressive film and consensus rankings, hard to take anything you say seriously from here on out. I'd love to hear why you think he's less talented than a guy like Custis or Enoicy.Despite the Star ranking KJ is probably the least talented of the WRs I'm this class He was almost guaranteed to RS. So going to prep school should have minimal impact on his career if he gets here by January
You mind giving your rationale on this one? Without any proper explanation from you debunking his impressive film and consensus rankings, hard to take anything you say seriously from here on out. I'd love to hear why you think he's less talented than a guy like Custis or Enoicy.
It's irrational when he gives no reasoning besides his opinion, which doesn't mean much without him giving his qualifications for breaking down highlights of 17 year olds. I'm sure Anglerman appreciates you fighting his battles tooI don't think his statement is totally irrational. It's strong, but I can see someone making that argument.
So far Shafer is 2 for 2 on standing by non-quals (Corey Cooper and Wayne Williams).
http://www.syracuse.com/orangefootb...and_treevon_prater_fail_to_qualify_acade.html
No surprise on Prater - a little surprised on Williams but I think it might actually help in the long run if he comes in a year later. Thoughts?
"Williams, rated a four-star recruit by Rivals, Scout and 247 Sports, was one of the two wide receivers most likely to inject instant energy into the SU passing game as true freshmen."
I realize you are trying to put a positive spin on this. How can it "help," long term or not, losing a player with that kind of potential? Losing Williams is a big deal because it potentially impacts a position area most in need of play makers...right now.
007 said:"Williams, rated a four-star recruit by Rivals, Scout and 247 Sports, was one of the two wide receivers most likely to inject instant energy into the SU passing game as true freshmen." I realize you are trying to put a positive spin on this. How can it "help," long term or not, losing a player with that kind of potential? Losing Williams is a big deal because it potentially impacts a position area most in need of play makers...right now.
We've come a long way from the days of "Welcome to campus, Alec Lemon. Oh by the way, you're on the two deep."From a fan perspective, I think most people look at the pure athleticism an athlete comes to the game with and don't often see the other intangibles that are involved. Based on nothing more than his grades, the probability that he would've have played as a true frosh was probably nil even if he had qualified. In my opinion, the staff would have spent more time his freshman year getting him acclimated to the academic side of college sports - get successful in the classroom first.
The other side is the academic portion if the game itself - learning a playbook is almost as difficult as learning physics - it takes time for some of these young men to understand all the nuances of the game. Some of the most gifted athletes never see the field in college because of this.
Hopefully Mr. Williams is able to get to prep, concentrate on his classroom skills and get a head start on the transition.
So does this open up two spots for commits in the current class to enroll in January and count against 2014? Ideally it's Williams and Prater but could be any of the current commits if those two need at least a full year of prep, right?
But the main reason why Alec started his freshman year was not his athleticism - he definitely would've been better served having a redshirt year - it was his understanding of the playbook from the start that put him on the field.
I'll fight it also just for kicks. Opinions can be rational even when not explained in full. Reasons for opinions are rational or irrational - and we don't have those to go on. So what you really mean is, 'could you please tell us your line of thought that led you to this opinion?'.It's irrational when he gives no reasoning besides his opinion, which doesn't mean much without him giving his qualifications for breaking down highlights of 17 year olds. I'm sure Anglerman appreciates you fighting his battles too
Position probably also has the most depth of any on the roster - something like 16 scholarship guys. I'm not too concerned about losing a freshman for this year. Next man up is right.