Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Zcuse, post: 1728972, member: 3001"]
'Cuse is not Rutgers or George Mason, silly analogy. The response was saying that two good teams (that can go deep);  would the transfer go to a team with a hole in lineup to hopefully contribute greatly, or simply gravytrain on a F4 favorite.

We have a 7'2" center coming in next year (in addition to our 6th year Center), Lydon more physically mature (who is a near lock to be a pro for a decade + eventually- a player next year's offense can run through), Richardson (I think he'll be back in the end a college mismatch as he develops further), Battle (who seems to compare very favorably to be a Richardson type replacement),   4th year player Roberson (who dominated the boards in nearly every "big" game and is ding a midrange game), along with Moyer for forward depth, and Frank Howard for guard rotation. That is a team that can hit the elite 8/+ easy. Even if Richardson goes pro, Battle can take Richardson's minutes, and they still have players to "run" the offense through and plenty of length to play the zone.  
Do you think this transfer Guard would PREFER to go to a team 3 guards deep and ride the pine and root for his final 4 brothers? Or be the 2nd/3rd guard contributing to that final 4 pursuit?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?