Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="KaiserUEO, post: 317997, member: 272"] OPa, you know as well as anyone that TRADITION is what defines who you are in college football. a johnny come lately like boise can win a couple of games, shock a few people, but at the end of the day, theyre still a piss-ant school from idaho playing on a stupidarse blue carpet. look at hoop too, its not like the ACC was ready to invite george mason after 1 nice run in the tourny, same for the b1g and valpo. the haves and have nots were decided 60 years ago. Syracuse & Pitt = haves rut & storz = have nots who got the ACC invite?? who did not?? who is in the big 5 confs?? who is not?? there is probably 2 spots left...both in the bevo. lville, houston and smu all fit, because they can argue 'have' status better than anyone else. even then, someone is getting left out. your points sometime seem like you are putting the newnewnewnewbigeast in with the big 5 confs. clearly, they shouldnt be mentioned in the same breath. [/QUOTE]