BlackKnight76
All American
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 4,473
- Like
- 3,855
FrancoPizza said:Our class is still rated 45-55 range. Not a huge leap. Nor should that surprise. I think we've become so accustomed to mediocrity that we've moved the goalposts. I think the biggest positive to take away from all this is that the staff might be poised to take recruiting to the next level if they can actually win some -in games. Alas, we're still serenading what-ifs and maybes for the better part of the last decade. I'm tired of waiting for the pieces to come together. Doesn't mean I've given up though.
Yeah, not since the good ol' Greg Robinson days.We haven't been in that range for a decade.
If you don't mind me asking, if he's such an exceptional talent, why is he only rated 3 stars? Nice get for sure but let's not judge through orange colored glasses.
Our class is still rated 45-55 range. Not a huge leap. Nor should that surprise. I think we've become so accustomed to mediocrity that we've moved the goalposts.
I think the biggest positive to take away from all this is that the staff might be poised to take recruiting to the next level if they can actually win some -in games. Alas, we're still serenading what-ifs and maybes for the better part of the last decade. I'm tired of waiting for the pieces to come together. Doesn't mean I've given up though.
Because rvals is chock full of "experts".If you don't mind me asking, if he's such an exceptional talent, why is he only rated 3 stars? Nice get for sure but let's not judge through orange colored glasses.
Moe's 4.39 and 4.41 times sure are impressive. But shifty and quick feet are likewise important...like Joe Morris. Anyone have an idea what Quadry Ishmail and his brother's times were in the 40? Just curious. Thanks.
2016 - 50
60
51
74
66
76
78
118
48
48
52
56
50
53
44
CuseOnly said:Our class is rated 45-55 with only 14 kids committed, not 25. Keep that in mind, most services are cumulative where the more kids you have the more points you get. We are that high with half the kids that we usually take in a class. Normally with 14 kids, we would be well into the 60-70's.
Oh, I thought I responded to a post that said we haven't been in the 45-55 range for a decade.
You're response has no merit since right now it's lower using average instead of total.
CuseOnly said:You know me as someone that really doesn't agree or like the star ratings in general but those team rankings are cumulative, the more kids the more points, the higher the class is rated. Going by average star rating doesn't tell the whole story either. You can have a higher average ranking and still have a lower rated class based on total points.
I hope you end up being right, but the jury is still out on that.And just about where the comparison stops.
rrlbees said:Oh, I thought I responded to a post that said we haven't been in the 45-55 range for a decade. You're response has no merit since right now it's lower using average instead of total.
jekelish said:2 4 7 composite ratings, average grade: 2016: .8358 2015: .8229 2014: .8326 2013: .8128 2012: .8081 2011: .8099 2010: .8117 2009: .7958 2008: .8044 2007: .8056 2006: .7951 2005: .7938 2004: .7774 2003: .7913 That's as far back as the 2 4 7 ratings go for us. So right now, our 2016 has the highest average composite rating of any class we've had since at least 2003.
jekelish said:2 4 7 composite ratings, average grade: 2016: .8358 2015: .8229 2014: .8326 2013: .8128 2012: .8081 2011: .8099 2010: .8117 2009: .7958 2008: .8044 2007: .8056 2006: .7951 2005: .7938 2004: .7774 2003: .7913 That's as far back as the 2 4 7 ratings go for us. So right now, our 2016 has the highest average composite rating of any class we've had since at least 2003.