Those stats sure are. I had no idea...Stats are for losers
Just a minor nit: it appears you have Average as an observation in your line chart, which is improper representation. The linear trend is skewed.
These stats show what everyone is saying.
I didn't create the charts I posted what David Hale the ACC reporter for ESPN posted on his twitter.Just a minor nit: it appears you have Average as an observation in your line chart, which is improper representation. The linear trend is skewed.
Which is further evidence that ESPN reporters are moronsI didn't create the charts I posted what David Hale the ACC reporter for ESPN posted on his twitter.
i don't get what you're complaining about. how else do suggest they get a trend for how syracuse is doing by game?Which is further evidence that ESPN reporters are morons
i don't get what you're complaining about. how else do suggest they get a trend for how syracuse is doing by game?
first it's a minor nit, now they're morons.
who needs the charts, just watch the games and the coaching decisions. after you vomit, you will realize you don't need the charts to tell you anything.
Well, people were watching and prior to the latest debacle there was still a lot of talk of the O "looking" better. But I think people were focused on the 1 or 2 drives each game that went well, and were ignoring all the others than stunk.
djorange1989 said:they must have only been watching the first half of each game from UVA onward. 13 second half points TOTAL in the past four games from the offense I believe. 7 of which was Zach in garbage time last week after Dungey, well, we know what happened...
It was a minor not when I thought it was the OP. Much worse that it's ESPN.i don't get what you're complaining about. how else do suggest they get a trend for how syracuse is doing by game?
first it's a minor nit, now they're morons.
Don't need stats to know that we suck,Stats are for losers