Cuse69
Starter
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2018
- Messages
- 1,118
- Like
- 1,152
I think I disagreed with the whole list. Cutcliffe has done a very good job at Duke because well it’s Duke. But he is overrated. He is their Addazio.
Honestly don’t have a problem with the top three. Cutcliff is a really good football coach. Getting Duke to relevance is no easy task.
Honestly don’t have a problem with the top three. Cutcliff is a really good football coach. Getting Duke to relevance is no easy task.
Relevant is a strong word. He has spent one week in the Top 20 his entire career there. And only finished Top 25 once.
Turning Duke from 1-11 to 7-6 is an amazing feat.
Indeed.
Duke was THE punchline about bad college football teams for literally DECADES.
Like GERG x Rutgers x UConn levels of ineptitude, for ages.
Now they generally win as much or more than they lose, are competitive most years, and make bowl games on the regular.
For an all-time cellar dweller program, at what is clearly a hoops school, that's pretty remarkable.