OrangeDW
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2012
- Messages
- 65,383
- Like
- 200,514
That is debatable, I think Kelly is better than Moon. And behind only Montana and Marino in that era. You can say Kelly is next fighting with Steve Young Aikman when it comes to that era for 3rd. Aikman has the rings but Emmitt was the heart of that offense with the o-line. Young didn't do it as long as Kelly did but he won once. Moon never won anything of consequence ever.
When it comes to McNabb he is behind a lot of great QB's in his era and he never stood out and lost a lot of big games and always came up short. McNabb was a good QB. Good QB's don't get into the HOF. Ask Phil Simms and Boomer Esiason!
And Kurt Warner since he came up. Went to 3 Super Bowls. Won one. Lost won when the Pats probably cheated from all reports. Then the last one he left the field late in the game with the lead and his defense let him down. Warner I have higher than McNabb by a spot or two
What about Elway? Montana, Marino, Elway aren't even debatable as far as being better than Kelly, IMO.
Young was too IMO. Did it for shorter time...because he was on the same team as arguably the best QB of all time for years.
Aikman/Moon are debatale, but you don't seem to be consistent in your takes with them...Aikman, even though he won, wasn't better because he had more help(debatable, by the way). Moon didn't win so he wasn't better.
McNabb has better numbers and individual accolades than Simms and Boomer...because he was a better player than them.
Kurt Warner had more help than any of these guys...4 Rams teammates who are or will be in the HOF on his side of the ball.