Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 888209, member: 652"] As I have said many times I think it may have been Lou_C or Billybud, but one of them said the reason Florida State voted no on the increase to 50 million dollars was that Swofford/ACC didn't follow the bylaws that required any vote change the bylaws required 14 days notice, and that notice hadn't been given by the ACC. Thus, Florida State president Barron voted no to protect FSU in case they were able to leave for the SEC. Maryland never made this procedural argument in their original suit, and I don't know if it was waived by not pleading it or not. I would think under the FRCP or NCRCP that yes it would be waived, but Maryland may try anyway. Maryland's argument is that this an anti-trust violation and I just don't see that argument being successful. [/QUOTE]