Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Phillymoose, post: 888593, member: 254"] [I] b/c of "counsel and direction...received from ESPN," the ACC has tried to lure other schools "to extract more lucrative terms." [/I] So.. let me get this straight. ESPN has counseled the ACC to lure other schools to extract more lucrative terms... from whom? ...From ESPN! so...ESPN has counseled the ACC to take certain actions so that ESPN will pay the ACC more money. And there is supposed to be some kind of wrongdoing there? Like if I want to buy a house and I tell the owners I will pay more for it if they renovate the kitchen? This isn't even frivolous. It doesn't make any sense. Also how does MD have standing for a tortious interference claim with the B1G anyway? And... AND.. how can an institution burn bridges in this environment? I mean - who knows who you will end up in bed with a few years from now? It is just crazy stupid. Cray-cray. [/QUOTE]