Moore played....why? | Syracusefan.com

Moore played....why?

SmilinBob

Living Legend
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
11,712
Like
11,287
I don't get it, what if Smith leaves...... why use Moore in a game that is 55-0 and waste a year?
 
another question .. why was Broyld on KO team when we are up 30 .. and risk him getting hurt
 
Maybe Moore doesn't want to redshirt. He has been here awhile.

I was wondering about that...SS had his arm around him and was talking to him on the sidelines when it looked like he was going in.
 
The whole red shirt thing is very confusing. But I've read in plain print that if you play one play that kills any chance of red shirting. But then I have multiple people in the know that say it's a percentage of plays or games? What gives?
 
The whole red shirt thing is very confusing. But I've read in plain print that if you play one play that kills any chance of red shirting. But then I have multiple people in the know that say it's a percentage of plays or games? What gives?

If you suffer a season ending injury during the first half of the season, and you only played in 3 contests or 30% of the games (whichever is greater), you can petition the NCAA to have the year "reclassified" as a redshirt year if you have one available (look under the medical hardship rule for all the details).

If you are uninjured, the year counts.
 
I think he has played in all 3 games this year, no? Scored a TD last week.

NM, I see you mean AAM. Maybe to prep for the tank role again this year?
 
I think he has played in all 3 games this year, no? Scored a TD last week.

NM, I see you mean AAM. Maybe to prep for the tank role again this year?

Smith is scoring like a madman inside the five, hell he's scoring more than Don Draper.
 
I think he has played in all 3 games this year, no? Scored a TD last week.

NM, I see you mean AAM. Maybe to prep for the tank role again this year?


The redzone performance has been 180 from where it was last year. There isn't an essential need for him to play this year. Cleveland and Coker can handle the short yardage FB role, we don't play out of the I so the FB doesn't have a role as a runner in this offense.
 
I don't get it, what if Smith leaves...... why use Moore in a game that is 55-0 and waste a year?
I've gotten upset about red shirts where I thought we could use him later.

I'm not upset about this one though
 
I've gotten upset about red shirts where I thought we could use him later.

I'm not upset about this one though

I'm all for red shirting players but Moore? We have McFarlane and GMII as well as another year of Moore for depth purposes. That's really a nice set up. No need for an extra year of AAM.
 
just where is smith going? he is not the radar of any pro teams.
 
I'm not upset because I think we can use him later, I'm upset because if he wasn't in the plans he could have transferred somewhere with two years to play, even if not at this level. That's off the table now. I don't think we could have done better by the guy is all.

I know people are going to say "that's not the staff's responsibility " and stuff like that. I don't care. I don't like it.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I'm not upset because I think we can use him later, I'm upset because if he wasn't in the plans he could have transferred somewhere with two years to play, even if not at this level. That's off the table now. I don't think we could have done better by the guy is all.

I know people are going to say "that's not the staff's responsibility " and stuff like that. I don't care. I don't like it.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2

How do you know the staff didn't sit down with him during the offseason and tell him what his role would be going forward, and he still elected to remain at SU.
 
How do you know the staff didn't sit down with him during the offseason and tell him what his role would be going forward, and he still elected to remain at SU.
I don't. My assumption is that if the plan was to play him at all we would have seen him a lot sooner in the season.

Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
 
I've gotten upset about red shirts where I thought we could use him later.

I'm not upset about this one though

Agree. I don't think he's the type of back the staff is looking for. I don't think this is worth anyone getting too upset over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - http://tapatalk.com/m/
 
How do you know the staff didn't sit down with him during the offseason and tell him what his role would be going forward, and he still elected to remain at SU.
I do know and I can tell you he was told the opposite of what you think. I'll wait and see what happens this season before I pass judgement..
 
Moore did not play*.

* This is a peeve of mine. There's only one player on the team with that last name, and he did not play.

87 Kendall Moore Fr. OL

If people don't have time to type Adonis' last name, please abbreviate his name as AAM instead of butchering his last name.

34 Adonis Ameen-Moore Jr. FB

I too was surprised to see AAM in there.
 
Moore did not play*.

* This is a peeve of mine. There's only one player on the team with that last name, and he did not play.

87 Kendall Moore Fr. OL


Moore played. He had 1 catch for 9 yards. And I agree, people should just use AAM.
 
Why would the team want to keep around our 2nd string FB and our 5th option at RB for another year? They most likely want to free up his scholarship for another player. It stinks to see players that come in with hype and never make much of an impact, but that happens.
 
[
Why would the team want to keep around our 2nd string FB and our 5th option at RB for another year? They most likely want to free up his scholarship for another player. It stinks to see players that come in with hype and never make much of an impact, but that happens.
What stinks is when 'fans' think they know something when in fact they don't have a clue. If people continue to think because a kid doesn't play, he can't play I don't know what to tell them, other than there are MANY reasons for that to happen and it's too bad..
 

Forum statistics

Threads
170,458
Messages
4,892,116
Members
5,998
Latest member
powdersmack

Online statistics

Members online
240
Guests online
2,302
Total visitors
2,542


...
Top Bottom