My Questions for Tonight's Adrian Autry Show

[SWC75]

Coach Autry’s radio show is on Thursdays, from 7-8:30PM on ESPN Radio in Syracuse, which is AM1200 or FM 97.7 on the dial. The show is at Carrabba's Italian Grill at 550 Towne Drive, Fayetteville, NY. The first hour, hosted by Matt Park, the Voice of the Orange, is on their general network. They are again doing a third half hour segment on Twitch: I think I will save myself some time by posting the main show and linking the Twitch segment the next day when it shows up on You-Tube.

Their schedule: AmeriCU Adrian Autry Radio Show Starts Nov. 14 - Syracuse University Athletics

You can call into the show locally at 315-424-8599 or nationally at 1-888-746-2873. For Gomez’s portion, use 315-424-8599. Or you can submit questions from this page:
Submit a Question! - Syracuse University Athletics The choice, finally is the “Adrian Autry Show” or the “Fran Brown Show”!
Or on Twitter at x.com or Twitter (@CuseLearfield) using the hashtag #AskAutry.

The show can be heard in Syracuse on FM 99.5. It’s sometimes simulcast on AM 1200 or FM 97.7. You can also get it on: TuneIn | Free Internet Radio | Live News, Sports, Music, Audiobooks, and Podcasts If not, try: https://cuse.com/watch?Live=6575&type=Live


MY QUESTIONS/COMMENTS

“Coach, I went over some recent scores: Texas lost to #1 Tennessee by four points and to #2 Auburn by 5 while Texas Tech lost to #3 Iowa State by 1 point. We lost to Texas by 4 and Texas Tech by 5. Georgetown lost to #7 Marquette and #9 Connecticut by 8 points each. Notre Dame lost to #4 Duke by the same margin. We lost to Georgetown by 4 and split with Notre Dame, outscoring them by a combined 3 points. Does this team realize how good it could be?”

The Twitch Segment:

“Coach, Kyle Cuffe scored 9 points in 15 minutes. Chris Bell scored 4 in 18. Lucas Taylor scored 4 in 24 and Petar Majstorovic never scored in 21 minutes. We often have multiple guys who aren’t scoring in the line-up at the same time. How do you decide who should be out there and for how long?”

 

[HyattsCuse]

I like the Twitch question. I'm interpreting it as polite way of saying his random rotations don't often make sense so what's the rationale?

Cuffe is a perfect example. Not only from scoring production, but you would think he was our best D option against Clemson's guards yet only gets 15 minutes yesterday? Carlos got 20?!

First question, I fear you're going to get a generic, "We just haven't put it all together" / making mistakes type answer.

 

[hoopsupstate]

Everyone is talking about our offense breaking down last night. We gave up 86 points. That’s why we lost. Ask him why nobody can keep people from going to their strong hand? Why do we continually go under the screens? Why can’t we defend a simple flair screen. Why are our bigs nowhere to be found when guys come off simple curl screens? Why does Lampkin plop himself under the rim on defense and doesn’t move. The only good thing it does is he gets hit in the head with the ball after it comes out of the net. Do we switch on the wing? On offense, why does Lampkin and our bigs NEVER roll to the rim if they try to screen? No one on this team cuts or gives themselves up to get a teammate open. Our wings just run around to the corners when we have the ball. Why? They can’t shoot. They put no pressure on the defense. Why does Lampkin always catch the ball twenty feet from the basket? We can screen to get him the ball inside eight feet. I’d love to hear Red explain these simple, basic fundamental issues with this team. Somehow he can’t get these basic things clear to his players.

 

[Irishsecra1]

I never know from game to game how much we are going to see Kyle Cuffe.
He is one guy who works his ass off, is our best hustling defender, yet always seems to be shunted aside for the more highly recruited players.

He kind of proves that hard work, good defense, good foul shooting and energy galore are just not going to be rewarded in Red's lineups. When Bell plays more than him, even Carlos, it just burns me bad.

Maybe if he had a more defined role, we would see more consistency in his shooting. He has proven recently that he can make 3s, but they have to be part of the game flow. Not one of the many throw away bricks that his teammates put up.

 

[Blanko97]

Oh god, that first question is going to pump their egos so much lol They are anything but good

 

[SWC75]

Everyone is talking about our offense breaking down last night. We gave up 86 points. That’s why we lost. Ask him why nobody can keep people from going to their strong hand? Why do we continually go under the screens? Why can’t we defend a simple flair screen. Why are our bigs nowhere to be found when guys come off simple curl screens? Why does Lampkin plop himself under the rim on defense and doesn’t move. The only good thing it does is he gets hit in the head with the ball after it comes out of the net. Do we switch on the wing? On offense, why does Lampkin and our bigs NEVER roll to the rim if they try to screen? No one on this team cuts or gives themselves up to get a teammate open. Our wings just run around to the corners when we have the ball. Why? They can’t shoot. They put no pressure on the defense. Why does Lampkin always catch the ball twenty feet from the basket? We can screen to get him the ball inside eight feet. I’d love to hear Red explain these simple, basic fundamental issues with this team. Somehow he can’t get these basic things clear to his players.

Your call into the show should be interesting

 

[SWC75]

Oh god, that first question is going to pump their egos so much lol They are anything but good

The first question was composed after the BC game, the second after the Clemson game. I though they made a good combination.

 

[orangepassion]

Is the 1st question a serious question?

 

[SWC75]

The answer to my first question:

Matt tried to reform the question slightly, asking what our ceiling was, what capability the players have. "There’s been trip-ups like Georgetown and Notre Dame, measuring sticks like Tennessee and Maryland, we’ve beaten teams we should have beaten.” He cited some comebacks, including the Notre Dame game AG: We played Georgetown and Notre Dame without JJ. This team’s ceiling is a little better than this. We preach 40 minutes. I think they give us effort. Sometimes it’s about the Jimmys and the Joes. We’ve just got to figure it out…Louisville and Clemson have really good players. Sometimes you’ve just got to chalk it up to that.”

 

[SWC75]

Question 2:

"If we don’t play any of those guys we won’t have a team out there. We’ve got to get clicking on offense. Kyle’s been really good but we need more (guys scoring)."

 

[SWC75]

They will be in California next week. There will be no live call-in show, just an recorded interview between Matt and the coach.

 

[jdubs30]

The answer to my first question:

Matt tried to reform the question slightly, asking what our ceiling was, what capability the players have. "There’s been trip-ups like Georgetown and Notre Dame, measuring sticks like Tennessee and Maryland, we’ve beaten teams we should have beaten.” He cited some comebacks, including the Notre Dame game AG: We played Georgetown and Notre Dame without JJ. This team’s ceiling is a little better than this. We preach 40 minutes. I think they give us effort. Sometimes it’s about the Jimmys and the Joes. We’ve just got to figure it out…Louisville and Clemson have really good players. Sometimes you’ve just got to chalk it up to that.”

I mean it’s true but I’m surprised he said it

 

[Cuse4455]

The answer to my first question:

Matt tried to reform the question slightly, asking what our ceiling was, what capability the players have. "There’s been trip-ups like Georgetown and Notre Dame, measuring sticks like Tennessee and Maryland, we’ve beaten teams we should have beaten.” He cited some comebacks, including the Notre Dame game AG: We played Georgetown and Notre Dame without JJ. This team’s ceiling is a little better than this. We preach 40 minutes. I think they give us effort. Sometimes it’s about the Jimmys and the Joes. We’ve just got to figure it out…Louisville and Clemson have really good players. Sometimes you’ve just got to chalk it up to that.”

Clemson brought in guys of equal rating transfer wise as we did. The problem is we've got guys that have had drop offs in scoring Bell went from 12.0 to 9.6, Jyare the previous two seasons 16ppg, this year 8. Lucas Taylor 14.6 last year, 5.4 this year. Clemson has a system and they get guys who complement that system... I'm not even sure what our system is. Louisville has money to spend but that's also because they clean slated the entire roster and coaching staff.

 

[orangepassion]

The answer to my first question:

Matt tried to reform the question slightly, asking what our ceiling was, what capability the players have. "There’s been trip-ups like Georgetown and Notre Dame, measuring sticks like Tennessee and Maryland, we’ve beaten teams we should have beaten.” He cited some comebacks, including the Notre Dame game AG: We played Georgetown and Notre Dame without JJ. This team’s ceiling is a little better than this. We preach 40 minutes. I think they give us effort. Sometimes it’s about the Jimmys and the Joes. We’ve just got to figure it out…Louisville and Clemson have really good players. Sometimes you’ve just got to chalk it up to that.”

Watching the game last night, Clemson didn't seem dramatically more talented, if at all. Better, but not more talented.