My Take | Page 2 | Syracusefan.com
.

My Take

We were down two scores midway in the 4th and were inside the Tenn 20, but a batted ball stopped the potential score that could have closed it to 8 points. Not sure many figured we'd be in that situation given how the first quarter went. Wipe out the two defensive TDs for Tenn and it's tied (or close to it) in the fourth. I'm thinking there's more positive than negative out of this game.
 
We are going to smash Yukon. The RBs were not the main problem against the blitz. It was as if the OL could not zone block.

Uconns a tricky opponent. I suspect it will be closer them people think. Their offense has some nice skill pieces at Wr in Bell and a good RB stable. The QB Fagnano is in his 7th year (no joke) and can sling it though he has accuracy issues. If the Syracuse D doesn't shore up some of the run and coverage issues were gonna have a problem.

On the other hand Uconn defensively lost its entire front 7 from last year and 2 secondary guys. They apparently got zero pressure today vs a 1AA school and the dline struggled. I suspect SU is gonna try and ram it Down their throats and PA them once they get it going.

This game comes down to whatever D can get a few stops and or multiple turnovers. SU dominated yardage last year but mistakes had it a 1 score game. Again tricky game
 
The Tenn defense will end up being very good. Unfortunately for us we play a few of those teams this year. But I’d grade the O on that curve and give them a positive final mark. Angeli will be fine.

Last year our O looked rough in the first game vs a weak opponent (blocking in particular) and they got better the next week. Most of the blitzes that were successful were missed assignments and correctable.

The defense? Will not be great this year but will have their moments.
 
The Tenn defense will end up being very good. Unfortunately for us we play a few of those teams this year. But I’d grade the O on that curve and give them a positive final mark. Angeli will be fine.

Last year our O looked rough in the first game vs a weak opponent (blocking in particular) and they got better the next week. Most of the blitzes that were successful were missed assignments and correctable.

The defense? Will not be great this year but will have their moments.
Great stuff TCat.

Overall, I liked most of what I saw on Saturday. I’m not as worked up about the defense as most. Need the IDL to strain more in the run game. Also need McDonald (a veteran of the system) to set forward. In the modern game, tackling is always gonna struggle early in the season because no one goes to the ground in camp (admittedly, Vols were really good here). Really hope Grant is okay. Not sure if he returned after his ankle got rolled up on. He’s integral to any successes we might have.

As I learned more about the Vols, kept hearing that out of their defense was strong on all three levels. And I think that was accurate. And that their DL was really, really good. Their DL coach, Rodney Garner, has been coaching the position in the SEC since 1998 and won the DL Coach of the Year award for 2024. The man can coach. So I was very pleased with our OL in the run game. They did struggle a bit with the blitz, but that can be remedied with time, continuity and continued healthy reps. We will miss LeQuint, who was singularly the finest RB in college last year in pass protection/picking up the blitz.

And yet, the offense played really well. 26 points (only Ohio State and UGA scored that many against the Vols last year). And a number of sustained drives. Angeli gets a solid B-, perhaps even a B if grading to consider the pressure in his face. He’s gonna be just fine.

Last few …

The kids gotta be ready to play right from the jump. That’s confidence. Or lack there of.

Those lamenting that we played that game against an SEC program of ilk can sukc it. I am sick of trying to artificially engineer 6 wins. Fran is here is win. To measure just who and what we are. The loss to the Vols will bear fruit. Maybe next week, maybe next year. It’s coming. Proud of the program yesterday.

Let’s lay off the ERob venom. The Vols won handily, but they had 14 points handed to them by our offense (short field, scoop score). Falling behind so early opened things up for their offense. And their QB performed. Needed him to be erratic. I’m not sure Belichick or Buddy Ryan could’ve stymied the Vols on Saturday. Let’s just be realistic folks.

And on to UConn. Cannot wait.
 
This defensive scheme and missed attention to detail has a real chance of derailing what Fran is trying to build.

The offense was so good last year that it helped mask the shortcomings of the defense and special teams.

It’s not just missed tackles or the lack of pressure. The whole scheme is constantly on its heels because it lacks an identity and strength. I really don’t think the coach who can fix it is on this staff. It’s not like Fran was a successful DC who could assume the role. They need to figure it out until he can replace the DC with someone who is qualified to lead it.

The biggest mistake Fran has made so far (and there haven’t been many) is putting his friends in key roles like DC.
 
This defensive scheme and missed attention to detail has a real chance of derailing what Fran is trying to build.

The offense was so good last year that it helped mask the shortcomings of the defense and special teams.

It’s not just missed tackles or the lack of pressure. The whole scheme is constantly on its heels because it lacks an identity and strength. I really don’t think the coach who can fix it is on this staff. It’s not like Fran was a successful DC who could assume the role. They need to figure it out until he can replace the DC with someone who is qualified to lead it.

The biggest mistake Fran has made so far (and there haven’t been many) is putting his friends in key roles like DC.
Well said
 
This defensive scheme and missed attention to detail has a real chance of derailing what Fran is trying to build.

The offense was so good last year that it helped mask the shortcomings of the defense and special teams.

It’s not just missed tackles or the lack of pressure. The whole scheme is constantly on its heels because it lacks an identity and strength. I really don’t think the coach who can fix it is on this staff. It’s not like Fran was a successful DC who could assume the role. They need to figure it out until he can replace the DC with someone who is qualified to lead it.

The biggest mistake Fran has made so far (and there haven’t been many) is putting his friends in key roles like DC.
Disagree a bit

I don’t think identity is all that important. It’s just a tell for the offense? The best defenses are able to shift to takeaway the offenses best attributes - you gotta be good everywhere for that.

That said, I do think having studs at corner and playing a lot of man is one of our objectives. That’s an identity of sorts and one that most of the high end defenses strive for. Unfortunately for us we had a talented young guy learn on the job vs an SEC offense and a really good offensive minded HC

I’m not that down on erob - doesn’t have the guys to do what he wants just yet. If any coaches can build the talent here at Syracuse to eventually get there, it’s Fran and co
 
Its tough to win a game vs a decent physical team if you lose all the big plays

The late run in the first when Tenn was gonna just run out the clock
The 75 yd play after we finally showed some life
the scoop and score
a fluke INT that led to a score

Tenn QB throws a ball that could easily been picked that flips the game as well.

Tenn ran much harder, and we tackled poorly way too often

On the flip side

We killed a drive with a formation issue early
we had first down at the 30 and didnt score because we fell down on a wide open play.
We had first down at the 9 and didnt score

chasing points vs scoring 34-40 vs Tenn is not a bad start for an offense thats got lots of new pieces

the D we looked slow all over. Missed tackles. No pressure

I wonder if we were just afraid to challenge the WRs?

Tenn has a good power rushing game. Lets give the DL some chance here to shows us

But we need a pass rush. Not sure where that comes from.
 
This defensive scheme and missed attention to detail has a real chance of derailing what Fran is trying to build.

The offense was so good last year that it helped mask the shortcomings of the defense and special teams.

It’s not just missed tackles or the lack of pressure. The whole scheme is constantly on its heels because it lacks an identity and strength. I really don’t think the coach who can fix it is on this staff. It’s not like Fran was a successful DC who could assume the role. They need to figure it out until he can replace the DC with someone who is qualified to lead it.

The biggest mistake Fran has made so far (and there haven’t been many) is putting his friends in key roles like DC.
IMO playing a system that requires 3 true Ss is doomed to failure at a school like SU. Two Ss and a hybrid S/LB can work but not 3 Ss. We won't be able to pull in enough talent to fill those 3 IMO. Also only having 2 LBs makes no sense to me.

I think the 3-3-5 with a good DC can work, but those DCs are hard to find. I think a 3-4 would work, but no one really plays that anymore. Or even an Okiesque 5-2/3-4 would be ideal, but again no one runs it. So I think we are best off going with an aggressive 4-3 that is Shafer/Schiano like. That type of D will overwhelm lessor competition. And vs decent to good teams it will be hit or miss. But that is fine since we will never have the talent to be good game in and game out.
 
Uconns a tricky opponent. I suspect it will be closer them people think. Their offense has some nice skill pieces at Wr in Bell and a good RB stable. The QB Fagnano is in his 7th year (no joke) and can sling it though he has accuracy issues. If the Syracuse D doesn't shore up some of the run and coverage issues were gonna have a problem.

On the other hand Uconn defensively lost its entire front 7 from last year and 2 secondary guys. They apparently got zero pressure today vs a 1AA school and the dline struggled. I suspect SU is gonna try and ram it Down their throats and PA them once they get it going.

This game comes down to whatever D can get a few stops and or multiple turnovers. SU dominated yardage last year but mistakes had it a 1 score game. Again tricky game
We will score 50. Hopefully we can hold Yukon under 30
 
Disagree a bit

I don’t think identity is all that important. It’s just a tell for the offense? The best defenses are able to shift to takeaway the offenses best attributes - you gotta be good everywhere for that.

That said, I do think having studs at corner and playing a lot of man is one of our objectives. That’s an identity of sorts and one that most of the high end defenses strive for. Unfortunately for us we had a talented young guy learn on the job vs an SEC offense and a really good offensive minded HC

I’m not that down on erob - doesn’t have the guys to do what he wants just yet. If any coaches can build the talent here at Syracuse to eventually get there, it’s Fran and co
It’s not a talent issue. It’s not even an inexperience issue in most areas. Yes, this was an SEC opponent but more has been done with less, much less, when it comes to orchestrating a defensive game-plan to at least keep the opponent from scoring less than 40+ points.

Right now this defense lacks a plan to promote your strengths, mask your weaknesses and exploit what the offense does not do well. That’s coaching. Not a talent issue. Successful defensive coordinators that we’ve had here like White and Shafer would’ve no question had a better plan here. I bet the outcome would’ve been better too.
 
If you can even tell me what the base D is I’d love to hear it. It was a 4-25 mixed with a 3-3-5 into a 4-3. Never really seen anything like that. You have to go 8 in the box against a UT. They had more OL on the field than we had in 2 levels at times
honestly, I have no clue what we played. Have to watch the replay. Very focused in the game on the play and don't necessarily pay attention to the schemes until I rewatch.

My comment is based on the fact that's what someone close to the team told me the gameplan was. We wanted to eliminate big plays, make them have long drives, limit to field goals at times, and then have our offense win in a higher scoring game. We weren't playing a very aggressive attacking style D because I think they know we couldn't do that. I'm not defending it as I still think we can utilize more scheme and stunts (and I hope we do make adjustments) since we don't have the talent to get to the QB on our own.

If we had limited those two turnovers and not given up two monster plays (one bad tackling where a guy should be stopped for a loss, the other leaving a true freshman in 1-on-1 coverage) I think we would have kept it much closer and had a shot. There's a reason my only confident bet on this game was taking the over.

Games often come down to a few big plays. We lost all of them. Season was never dependent on this game. I was always hoping we'd win one of the tough five games and maybe steal a second. (Tenn, Miami, SMU, Clemson, ND) to get to eight wins. But doing so requires our offense being good. I think it will be and will get better. Lot to build on there.

I think we match up better with Miami later in the year as our team gets better and we'll see where we are for SMU. Clemson in a few weeks will give us a much better litmus test if we clean up our mistakes, too.

The reality is we need to take care of business with all of our home games. I'm not feeling bad at all today.
 
Going into the game, I did not expect us to keep it close. Maybe if the game was later in the season but with all the turnover, it was just not realistic to expect us to be competitive here.

And yet, despite many issues and problems, the team found itself down 12 with the ball halfway through the fourth quarter or so.

So I guess I am pleased in some ways. But it felt like we blew an opportunity to pull an upset here. Kind of.

Heupel is a terrific offensive coach. He has a great scheme and he has high level athletes everywhere on the roster, except maybe QB, to execute his plans. Thought Aguilar did well overall, even though he isn’t very good throwing the ball. Lots of bad passes. But they gave him easy plays to execute and he got the job done.

Looked like they identified a major mismatch with young Samuel, and attacked him whenever they could. The kid really struggled and hopefully learned some things today. He has to improve a lot or this is going to be a long season. It did look like he got better as the game progressed.

On the positive side, it looked like Peal had a good game. Thought Bryant looked good, along with Chestnut. Pretty sure McDonald is playing with an injury so I am reluctant to criticize him a lot. But he struggled.

Thought Omopariola looked good, and Reese was okay too. Liked what Grant did. Made some nice tackles. Our DTs got dominated pretty badly. And a bunch of them got hurt. Rooks, Wilson and Thomas. They all returned to the game but it is not an encouraging thing to see so many hurt so early.

Disappointing we still can’t stop the run. Simple power runs seemingly can’t be stopped. We have a bunch of other schools on the schedule that will exploit this weakness if it continues. Also disappointing was our lack of ability to put pressure on the QB. Did we blitz at all? UT did a lot and it was a big factor in aiding them stopping some of our drives.

On offense, thought we ran it okay. Willis looks legit. Runs hard, tough guy. Nixon looked good too. We all know he is terrific as a receiver out of the backfield. Thought Angeli was good. His best play was when a blitzer came in untouched (that happened way too much), and he sidestepped him, stepped up, and just before getting sacked threw it to Bennett for a completion (pretty sure it extended a drive). Seemed to me as though he made almost all the passes he needed to make. Made the right reads for the most part and hung in there with guys in his grill.

We have to, pass block better. Our RBs have to be better picking up blitzes. Angeli needs to read blitzes and get rid of the ball faster. Thought our WRs did okay against the UT coverage, though Hood won almost every time they targeted him. He also committed PI almost every time they targeted him.

Cook appears to be a legit #1 receiver. He was open a lot and did damage when he got the ball. JRS was good. Russell made a few plays and impressed me. Gill didn’t get a lot of good chances but was there when he did. Villari was very good as a receiver and looked okay as a blocker but I think he was called for a couple procedure penalties where he presumably lined up off the LOS. Veterans can’t do that.

Stonehouse was excellent punting. Oh was good kicking off. Tripp was good kicking PATs. Kerr has to know where the ball is on coverage. Coverage units looked good. Special teams were solid. We looked like we were coached by a special teams coach who had done this job before.

I liked our game plan on offense and thought Nixon did a solid job other than the regular issues he apparently had getting plays to the offense. Plays always seemed to be coming in late and this led to rushed plays and wasted time outs. We need to do better here.

UConn enjoyed a cupcake today while we got banged up against a huge tough team. That is going to make the game more competitive. Hope we come to play and take the game seriously.
If Samuels had intercepted that one that got tipped his way (i.e. was more alert / ready / focused) and if the bad call which stalled our 1st drive didn't happen and if they called at least 2 PIs among the blatant 6 or so, then it would be a different outcome. Not a win per se, but we would have been in it the whole time.
 
It’s not a talent issue. It’s not even an inexperience issue in most areas. Yes, this was an SEC opponent but more has been done with less, much less, when it comes to orchestrating a defensive game-plan to at least keep the opponent from scoring less than 40+ points.

Right now this defense lacks a plan to promote your strengths, mask your weaknesses and exploit what the offense does not do well. That’s coaching. Not a talent issue. Successful defensive coordinators that we’ve had here like White and Shafer would’ve no question had a better plan here. I bet the outcome would’ve been better too.

White yes. Shafer maybe. His D was hit or miss here. But at least with him you have a chance of getting a hit. ERob has had one hit in 14 games. He shouldn't be judged for the Tennessee game. But when you see the same old as last year it raises concerns. The D needs to be fixed by Duke. ERob better have it figured out by then.
 
We are going to smash Yukon. The RBs were not the main problem against the blitz. It was as if the OL could not zone block.
They fell really easily for the misdirection and delayed blitz's then they had 1 or 2 studs on the Tenn line that were just able to get home 1 on 1 against our guys. Recipe for disaster but the reality is that Tennessee is going to do that to most teams and the same guys did it last year to top tier teams too.
 
We were down two scores midway in the 4th and were inside the Tenn 20, but a batted ball stopped the potential score that could have closed it to 8 points. Not sure many figured we'd be in that situation given how the first quarter went. Wipe out the two defensive TDs for Tenn and it's tied (or close to it) in the fourth. I'm thinking there's more positive than negative out of this game.
I go back and forth but the math checks out for sure that we were in it in the 4th somewhat. Tennessee fans said the same for what it's worth. They said they were surprised we didn't go away. Most other teams give up 38 points in the first 32 mins of the game and there wouldn't be any fight for the last 28 mins of the game.

Fran specifically said in the post game multiple times that he was happy the team stayed together and didn't quit.
 
White yes. Shafer maybe. His D was hit or miss here. But at least with him you have a chance of getting a hit. ERob has had one hit in 14 games. He shouldn't be judged for the Tennessee game. But when you see the same old as last year it raises concerns. The D needs to be fixed by Duke. ERob better have it figured out by then.
I'm with you, but I'm reserving opinion until after Uconn. If we are not dominating Uconn on all fronts next Saturday then alarm bells on ERob are going to be ringing real loud.
 
Its tough to win a game vs a decent physical team if you lose all the big plays

The late run in the first when Tenn was gonna just run out the clock
The 75 yd play after we finally showed some life
the scoop and score
a fluke INT that led to a score

Tenn QB throws a ball that could easily been picked that flips the game as well.

Tenn ran much harder, and we tackled poorly way too often

On the flip side

We killed a drive with a formation issue early
we had first down at the 30 and didnt score because we fell down on a wide open play.
We had first down at the 9 and didnt score

chasing points vs scoring 34-40 vs Tenn is not a bad start for an offense thats got lots of new pieces

the D we looked slow all over. Missed tackles. No pressure

I wonder if we were just afraid to challenge the WRs?

Tenn has a good power rushing game. Lets give the DL some chance here to shows us

But we need a pass rush. Not sure where that comes from.
Good recap. We played ok but lost the big play battle.

We got “beat” on the scoop and score, and bomb.

A lot of the other big plays were “close” plays that didn’t go our way. (Tank missed tackle, McDonald real good coverage on 3rd and long TD, tipped interception).
 
As someone else mentioned we miss LaQuint in blitz pickup. Willis is a beast but he needs to work on his protection. There were two plays I remember that he was out of position that led to Angeli getting hit or sacked. With his size if he stays in position it will give Angeli more time to make the play.
 
White yes. Shafer maybe. His D was hit or miss here. But at least with him you have a chance of getting a hit. ERob has had one hit in 14 games. He shouldn't be judged for the Tennessee game. But when you see the same old as last year it raises concerns. The D needs to be fixed by Duke. ERob better have it figured out by then.
Shafer’s defenses, especially during the Marrone years, were some of the best we’ve had here. For what they lacked in talent, they made up for it and more with planning, playcalling, attention to detail, etc. Shafer was a terrible head coach but he knew how to coordinate a defense.
 
I am still struggling with how we approached the LB room this off-season. LB should have been the top priority to address, and besides Bryant we did nothing.

Against Tennessee, PFF run defense grades.

McDonald- 39.5, worst on team
Deslauriers- 44.4, second worst on team
Sparrow- 48.1, 4th worst on team

Deslauriers is a freshman in his first game so he gets a pass. Sparrow is disappointing, and McDonald as a 5th year senior is just unacceptable. Not upgrading at his spot may kill us this year, he's that bad
 
Shafer’s defenses, especially during the Marrone years, were some of the best we’ve had here. For what they lacked in talent, they made up for it and more with planning, playcalling, attention to detail, etc. Shafer was a terrible head coach but he knew how to coordinate a defense.
This. He was really good at scheming complex blitz packages and bringing pressure from all over the field. He understood that if you have a talent mismatch, you need to confuse the offense and gamble on being disruptive. We gave up some big plays, but we also had way, WAY more TFL when he was DC.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,027
Messages
5,129,373
Members
6,098
Latest member
volsfan

Online statistics

Members online
197
Guests online
1,776
Total visitors
1,973


...
Top Bottom