Don't forget the FFS and its two divisions, WITF and WTAF...Anyone's welcome to join...
as long as you can afford the minimum $6 million per year fee.
Adult table FBS
Kiddie table FBS
FCS.
Maybe you should start reading non-American media. We're a developing country comparatively when you look at the poverty gap, infrastructure, and education.It’s always weird when people crap on our education system and yet here we are…… the most powerful country in the world for how long now? We didn’t get here because we’re dumb.
I like the idea of keeping NIL, in house and reporting it. Penalties on transfers, etc...The obvious system here, in my opinion, is to bring all the NIL money in house with the schools and report it through the NCAA, and probably make it publicly available info. The schools can solicit donations for it from boosters, and that could be made uncapped, but there need to be records on it. Then when Football Factory College signs a kid away through the transfer portal from We Don't Have Oil Money University, they have to pay them a hefty transfer fee - I would propose X% of the value of the NIL money, where X = the % of snaps that kid played on his side of the ball for WDHOMU. Require that money to be paid out in NIL by WDHOMU within, say, four years. This ensures that the money is going to the players, but also allows WDHOMU to benefit from recruiting and developing players, and to save up that money for a few years and pick the right year to go all-in.
It won't be real parity because Football Factory College and Football State University and University of Gridiron all get to go spend unlimited funds buying the best free agents, but at least We Don't Have Oil Money University and We At Least Pretend Our Athletes Go to Class College can compete once or twice a decade if they can find good coaches and run a good program with the money they do have and then save up and try to contend cyclically - which means every year a few of them will be good.
I'm all for gender equality, but they have to find a way to not make it this even distribution between football/basketball and non-revenue sports. I get that it is sexist and inherently unfair that by far the most money in sports is in mens' sports, at the pro and college levels, but it's also insane to pay athletes in non-revenue sports millions of dollars - and that would make it harder for smaller schools to compete in both categories. If it has to be even, Texas A&M is going to fielding the best Equestrian and Volleyball teams ever assembled and paying them millions, just so they can pay their football players the most.
The colleges that want to can. It can all still be funded by boosters, the same way boosters foot the bill for coaching buyouts. I see this as just changing the semantics of NIL. Now coaches can be directly openly involved instead of being sneaky like they are now. And players won't necessarily have to make silly appearances and the like to justify the money. If uncapped, the big boy schools will have players being paid more by boosters than some veteran NFL guys.Colleges can’t afford it plain and simple
They get the vig.
I'm on the record that this will destroy higher education as we know it.
I'm fine blowing up college sports.
But not at the expense of higher education as an institution.
Maybe you should start reading non-American media. We're a developing country comparatively when you look at the poverty gap, infrastructure, and education.
This won't survive a day in a court of law. Every attorney in America would wanna take this case.
i doubt you're right of course but for once i hope you areI'm on the record that this will destroy higher education as we know it.
The Can of Worms that would be opened is not just related to Title IX, although that is a hugh one. How do you compensate only male football and basketball players? You can't.
Since they are now "professionals" are other benefits, like sneakers, tuition, etc, taxable benefits?
Technically, Yes.
I respectfully disagree. I hate the way the direction is going, and ultimately think it will destroy college sports and really hurt the US performance in the Olympics. According to Google, SU has 712 student athletes. That would cost us $10,680,000/yr. That's about 25% of our ACC media money.AZ got to the heart of it. I don't disagree at all about the corruption you mentioned. But right now, that primarily happens outside of the academic mission of higher ed institutions. As it should.
These kinds of things will fundamentally change the organization of some higher education institutions in ways they aren't built for. The incentives will get out of whack and I don't trust the decision-makers to play in these arenas.
Bottomline, it's a jagged path to get there, but direct payment from institution to athlete will result in poorer outcomes for students.
And we can't afford that as a society, on multiple levels.
(I work in edtech and am acutely familiar with some aspects of higher education administration and decision-making. I mention this just so that people note that my opinion isn't perfect, but it's more informed than your standard sports fan on this topic, and I'm applying a broader lens to the discussion than just sports.)
It's not unsalvageable, and there are lots of reasons why many businesses are doing away with degree requirements, one prominent among them being that many jobs never needed a degree requirements in the first place.Higher education as an institution is likely unsalvageable; there's a reason many businesses are doing away with degree requirements. This might be the fatal blow- but in reality if this isn't, something else will be fairly soon.
You don't have any answers.i doubt you're right of course but for once i hope you are
I calculate it would cost us $10,680,000/yr.So someone do the math…could SU afford this or are we out of this model. Chop chop.