Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,716
According to Mark Emmert that is exactley what is underway right now. He seems to be heading the NCCA in the right direction. Trying to simplify the rules and make the book a lot thinner.how about a task force to study the elimination of the ncaa and creating a more relevant, streamlined, agency w/o the layers of fat and layers of archaic rules and regs .
According to Mark Emmert that is exactley what is underway right now. He seems to be heading the NCCA in the right direction. Trying to simplify the rules and make the book a lot thinner.
We'll see.
too much money involved to do that--to bad you're not king thoughThe NCAA doesn't apparently understand that this is a step in their own demise.
This is also a huge step in forcing Notre Dame into a conference. If the conferences control the bowls and how many of them there are, why the hell keep throwing bones to Notre Dame ? They are now officially on the clock.
One more thought - there are currently 35 bowls - 70 teams. If I recall correctly, if they reduce the number of bowls by just a few, to 31, then I think that helps support a 32 team playoff. (Forgive me for not doing the math right now...).
Bowls ought to be more exclusive than they are now, and if tied into a playoff of the top 32 teams, you have everyone who belongs, and the games take on more significance, and bowl attendance improves. You have to reduce the regular season back down to 10 games, but I think that would be preferable, if I were king.
Start the playoff the first week of December and you have the championship game in the first week of January.
The NCAA doesn't apparently understand that this is a step in their own demise.
This is also a huge step in forcing Notre Dame into a conference. If the conferences control the bowls and how many of them there are, why the hell keep throwing bones to Notre Dame ? They are now officially on the clock.
One more thought - there are currently 35 bowls - 70 teams. If I recall correctly, if they reduce the number of bowls by just a few, to 31, then I think that helps support a 32 team playoff. (Forgive me for not doing the math right now...).
Bowls ought to be more exclusive than they are now, and if tied into a playoff of the top 32 teams, you have everyone who belongs, and the games take on more significance, and bowl attendance improves. You have to reduce the regular season back down to 10 games, but I think that would be preferable, if I were king.
Start the playoff the first week of December and you have the championship game in the first week of January.
Based on what I read, there's nothing stopping Notre Dame from entering into an alliance with a bowl or two. And you can bet there are plenty of bowls out there that would love to have Notre Dame as a participant.
It would have to be an alliance with a conference, not a bowl. If the conferences control the bowls, then ND is on the outside looking in.
So in other words, how can we make the rules work so we can squeeze out every possible dollar. This is about the control of the cash flow and nothing else.
The NCAA doesn't apparently understand that this is a step in their own demise.
This is also a huge step in forcing Notre Dame into a conference. If the conferences control the bowls and how many of them there are, why the hell keep throwing bones to Notre Dame ? They are now officially on the clock.
One more thought - there are currently 35 bowls - 70 teams. If I recall correctly, if they reduce the number of bowls by just a few, to 31, then I think that helps support a 32 team playoff. (Forgive me for not doing the math right now...).
Bowls ought to be more exclusive than they are now, and if tied into a playoff of the top 32 teams, you have everyone who belongs, and the games take on more significance, and bowl attendance improves. You have to reduce the regular season back down to 10 games, but I think that would be preferable, if I were king.
Start the playoff the first week of December and you have the championship game in the first week of January.
It would have to be an alliance with a conference, not a bowl. If the conferences control the bowls, then ND is on the outside looking in.
Problem is that ND is a member of the big east and I don't see them signing on to this to exclude a member.
That assumes that the current BCS system remains in place and the BE retains their AQ status. I believe both of those things are going to change. Any bowl games that the BE might wind up with, are not going to be very attractive to ND.
I wonder if they cut Boise a sweet dealThey kept their BCS power by adding Boise so they will be able to swim in the cash, especially if ND steps up for them. You may be right and they may change how they calculate AQ status but to be honest the ACC has done worse than the BE so it could get interesting.
I wonder if they cut Boise a sweet deal
Problem is that ND is a member of the big east and I don't see them signing on to this to exclude a member.
There should never be a 32-team playoff.
Where did ND finish in the Big East standings last year ?
Well, 16 makes more sense, but if you did 32 teams and shortened the regular season by 2 games, you'd keep nearly all the existing bowls and incorporate them into a championship tournament. And you would eliminate a bunch of 6-6 teams playing each other in mid-December.
So, what will happen is that the bowls will try to "sell" their bowl game to the conferences. The conferences then will police their bowls. Basically, the NCAA does not want a repeat of the Fiesta Bowl, where they had to incur the legal liability. You have to believe that Notre Dame will have bowls lining up at their door.
There are not 32 teams in the country who deserve the opportunity to compete for the national championship. Each conference champ -- and a couple/few at-large teams. That's it. That's all you need.