Net Points, etc. (Cornell) |

Net Points, etc. (Cornell)


Bored Historian
Aug 26, 2011
I will again be doing a report after each game this season and a summary report at the end of the non-conference season, the ACC season and the post season.

Net Points
(points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks minus missed field goals and free throws, turnovers and personal fouls) Season net points and average per 40 minutes is in parenthesis.

Oshae Brissett 22NP in 40 minutes
Tyus Battle 20NP in 36 minutes
Paschal Chukwu 6NP in 20 minutes
Marek Dolezaj 3NP in 24 minutes
Buddy Boeheim 2NP in 5 minutes
Bourama Sidibe 2NP in 12 minutes
Frank Howard 2NP in 32 minutes
Elijah Hughes 1NP in 24 minutes
Jalen Carey -1NP in 7 minutes

DNP coach’s decision
Robert Braswell
Howard Washington



Offensive Dude of the Game, (O-Dog)
(Points plus assists)
Tyus Battle 26 points + 0 assists = 26

Shooting Efficiency
(Points minus field goal and free throw attempts)
Tyus Battle 26 points -7 mfg and 1 mft = 18

Scoring Efficiency
(Percentage of points scored divided by points they would have scored if they made every shot- minimum 10 possible points)
Oshae Brissett 19 of 30 possible points = 63.3%

Sat Us Down
(Who scored the first SU basket of each half)

1st Half- Tyus Battle lay-up 3 seconds in
2nd Half- Paschal Chukwu lay-up 46 seconds in

(Who scored the point that got us to 70, which gets you free tacos with your ticket stub)
No tacos for us!

My Man
(Who played the most minutes?)
Oshae Brissett 40 minutes



(Add each team’s offensive rebounds to their opponent’s defensive rebounds. Then figure the offensive rebounds as a percentage of that)
We rebounded 5 of our 26 misses = 19.2%
They rebounded 4 of their 25 misses = 16.0%

Effective Offensive Rebounding
(Divide second chance points by the offensive rebounds)
We got 7 points on 5 O-Rebs = 1.400 points/O-reb
They got 3 points on 4 O-Rebs = 0.750 points/O-reb

Unforced Turnovers
(Total turnovers – the other team’s steals = unforced turnovers)
We had 10 turnovers – 4 steals = 6 unforced
They had 14 turnovers – 7 steals = 7 unforced

Points per Takeaway
(Points off turnovers divided by the number of turnovers the other team had)
We had 18 points from 14 takeaways = 1.286 points/takeaway
They had 14 points from 10 takeaways = 1.400 points/takeaway

Unsettled Situations
(Effective offensive rebounding + Points per Takeaway: [Second Chance Point + Points off Turnovers] divided by [Offensive Rebounds + Opposition Turnovers)
We had 25 points in 19 unsettled situations = 1.316 points
They had 17 points in 14 unsettled situations = 1.214 points

Manufactured Possessions
(One teams rebounds + the other team’s turnovers)
We had 26 + 14 = 40
They had 25 + 10 = 35


(Shots made and attempted and the percentage for two point goal attempts, three point attempts and free throws)
We were 13 for 21 on twos, (61.9%), 8 for 21 on threes (38.1%) and 13 for 21 on frees (61.9%)
They were 11 for 19 on twos, (57.9%), 9 for 24 on threes (37.5%) and 6 for 9 on frees (66.7%)

(PIP= points in the paint, POP = points outside the paint, which is total points – PIP –free throws made, TREY: points from three point shots, TZ= Twilight Zone, which is POP – TREY, two point jumpers from outside the paint, FBP = fast break points POTO= points off turnovers)
We had 22 PIP, 28 POP, 24 TREY, 4 TZ, 18 POTO, 6 FBP
They had 12 PIP, 37 POP, 27 TREY, 10 TZ, 14 POTO, 6 FBP

Fast Break Percentage
(FBP/(defensive rebounds + blocks + steals)
We scored 6 FBP in 32 opportunities (18.8%)
They scored 6 FBP in 27 opportunities (22.2%)

First Chance/Second Chance
(FCP is First Chance Points, which is total points - second chance points – fast break points – free throws made. SCP is second chance points.)
We had 37 FCP and 7 SCP
They had 40 FCP and 3 SCP

Last Possessions
(Points scored on the last full possession of a half, a game or an overtime period.)
We scored 0 points
They scored 0 points

(Total points – bench points = starters points)
Our starters scored 55 points and our bench scored 8 points
Their starters scored 40 points and their bench scored 15 points

(The percentage of a team’s baskets that were assisted)
We assisted 9 of our 21 field goals = 42.9%
They assisted 17 of their 20 field goals = 85.0%

Team Offensive Possession Efficiency
(Possessions: Field goals attempted - offensive rebounds + turnovers + 47.5% of free throws attempted. Efficiency is total points divided by possessions)
We scored 63 points in 57 possessions = 1.105 points/ possession
They scored 55 points in 57 possessions = 0.965 points/possession
It was a 114 possession game.

Team Shooting Efficiency

(Points minus missed field goals and free throws)

We scored 63 points, missed 21 field goals and 8 missed free throws = net 34
They scored 55 points, missed 23 field goals and 3 missed free throws = net 29

(Points scored divided by potential points scored if we’d made every shot)

We scored 63 on 21 two point attempts, 21 three point attempts and 21 free throw attempts = 77 of a possible 126 points = 50.0% of possible points scored.
They scored 55 on 19 two point attempts, 24 three point attempts and 9 free throw attempts = 56 of a possible 119 points = 46.2% of possible points scored.

Breakdown by Quarters
(Points scored between the beginning of the game and the 10 minute mark of the first half, then halftime, then the 10 minute mark of the second half, the end of regulation and then overtime of there was one)

13-14, 20-10, 14-17, 16-14


(Two point shots and free throws attempted per times fouled.)
We attempted 21 two point shots, attempted 21 free throws and were fouled 18 times = 1.17; 1.17
They attempted 19 two point shots, attempted 9 free throws and were fouled 11 times = 1.73; 0.82;
We were more likely to get calls when attempting two point shots and got more free throws out of it when we were fouled.


- In our last two games we have 10 offensive rebounds of 51 missies (19.6%).

- It might have been a comfortable win if we’d made our free throws, (13 of 21).

- We did see a sort of balance in the SU attack: 21 two point attempts, 21 three point attempts and 21 free throw attempts.

- We got fouled a lot more times than Cornell and went to the line more times. Should we think that the refs had it in for Cornell, since we felt that they had it in for us at Ohio State. I think not because Cornell had no inside game at all while we have guys like Brissett and Battle that drive to the basket to score.

- Cornell led in several areas where you would expect Syracuse to lead: They got 10 points form the Twlight Zone to our 4; They were more likely to score on fast break opportunities (18.8% to 22.2%); their bench out-scored ours 8-15. They also had just one less rebound.
Last edited:
You can crunch my numbers any time (if you're a female or my CPA).

Forum statistics

Latest member

Online statistics

Members online
Guests online
Total visitors

Top Bottom