NET watch...

[OrangeXtreme]

 

[elimunelson]

Can someone make the case for Syracuse NOT in the tournament at this point? I suspect if we beat UVA we'll be nestled into the low 30s of the NET. We sometimes assume with our assumptions that no one we are competing for in the bracket will lose.

We're in and probably dancing btw the play in game and a non play in game

 

[CardiacCuse]

nc state remains quad 1 or 2?

 

[Ragman2000]

We may not even be a play-in game. Are we a 10 seed?

 

[JDemo]

nc state remains quad 1 or 2?

Quad 1 for the road win

 

[jdubs30]

Can someone make the case for Syracuse NOT in the tournament at this point? I suspect if we beat UVA we'll be nestled into the low 30s of the NET. We sometimes assume with our assumptions that no one we are competing for in the bracket will lose.

We're in and probably dancing btw the play in game and a non play in game

Only real case is low number of Q1 wins and we didn’t do anything on the road ... but that’s it

 

[CardiacCuse]

Quad 1 for the road win

weird. so road is top 70 and home is top 30 for quad 1? doesnt compute.

 

[rocfan44]

We may not even be a play-in game. Are we a 10 seed?

Win today and we may be. My gut says we are sitting at an 11 seed and Louisville is Xavier’s 12.

 

[rocfan44]

weird. so road is top 70 and home is top 30 for quad 1? doesnt compute.

it’s actually top 75 for road games!

 

[OrangeXtreme]

weird. so road is top 70 and home is top 30 for quad 1? doesnt compute.

Quad 1: Home 1-30, Road 1-75
Quad 2: Home 31-75, Road 76-135

 

[CardiacCuse]

it’s actually top 75 for road games!

in a season without fans...this disparity makes even less sense to me.

Not a fan of the quads system.

 

[Briancuse]

it’s actually top 75 for road games!

What about Neutral?

 

[wiseman3]

If we beat Virginia and North Carolina wins again, thats likely 2 more Quad 1 wins. How far do we jump up the NET? Couple that with a Buffalo win becoming quad 2, we could see a huge jump

 

[orange79]

weird. so road is top 70 and home is top 30 for quad 1? doesnt compute.

What about Neutral?

Here are the NET ranking breakdowns:

Quadrant 1: Home 1-30; Neutral 1-50; Away 1-75
Quadrant 2: Home 31-75; Neutral 51-100; Away 76-135
Quadrant 3: Home 76-160; Neutral 101-200; Away 136-240
Quadrant 4: Home 161-plus; Neutral 201-plus; Away 241-plus

 

[orange79]

If we beat Virginia and North Carolina wins again, thats likely 2 more Quad 1 wins. How far do we jump up the NET? Couple that with a Buffalo win becoming quad 2, we could see a huge jump

Frankly, I am very surprised by a 10 point jump over a Q2 opponent (NC St).

 

[jdubs30]

I hate that Pitt game so much

 

[orangecuse]

I hate that Pitt game so much

Well, that Notre Dame game was a gift as well, so the favor was returned in a sense. Additionally, we just as easily could be saying that against Bryant, Buffalo and Northeastern. We are right where this team's (JB's) assembly placed us. Perhaps, if JB actually landed a legit P5 center ready to contribute upon arrival, and not the project types instead, we'd be playing for a top 4 tourney seed?

 

[AZOrange]

Probably a 10 seed at worst at this point which is just amazing to say

 

[CuseBBall]

Hopefully the committee just uses it as a guide as it is a flawed system. Our home wins vs UNC VT and Clemson are better than a road win at NC State in my opinion.
also a win at Gonzaga should not count the same as a road win at NC State. But in this system there is no difference.

 

[Orangezoo]

Wins and Losses do not seem to correlate as much as the margin of victory and impacts to efficiency at least when it comes to game to game changes. We are 44 in Ken Pom after being in the low to mid 50s for a while. KPom and Net appear to correlate fairly well for some teams and we are one of those. NC State is 71 KP vs 72 Net now fyi.

 

[Orangemen]

it’s actually top 75 for road games!

I’ve always found that strange. Winning at the #1 NET team should be worth more than winning at the #75 team. This probably helps the mid major conference teams get quad 1s.

I think they need a quad 0 for wins at top 30.

 

[OrangeXtreme]

I’ve always found that strange. Winning at the #1 NET team should be worth more than winning at the #75 team. This probably helps the mid major conference teams get quad 1s.

I think they need a quad 0 for wins at top 30.

Winning on the road is rewarded more than winning at home.

 

[UnknownOrange]

15-2 in Q2+Q3+Q4 games, a top 45 NET ranking, and let's be honest the Syracuse name helps us here more than Boise State's brand.

We in.

 

[Orangemen]

Winning on the road is rewarded more than winning at home.

Agree, as it should.

But winning at a top 10 team is different than winning at a top 75 team. Current system has no top line way to differentiate.

 

[orangemass]

I hate that Pitt game so much

We'd be comfortably in with that crapfest