Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="sufandu, post: 4647826, member: 874"] Who are you quoting? You said there was never amateurism. I insist there was. Now you're trying to qualify if by saying it wasn't "honorable." When the subject of paying athletes comes up, whether or not the university is turning a profit is always what is referenced to justify paying the athletes. We both know the universities haven't always made money off of what became revenue sports. There was an era where they lost money, and most coaches weren't paid lucratively. So now you want to move the goalposts by saying an individual made money off of gambling. [/QUOTE]