Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="tep624, post: 4267291, member: 430"] What the NCAA simply should have done is say that NIL deals need to be for a specific player, from a reputable, existing company (could easily put in a minimum annual revenue over last 5 years or something like that hurdle), and it needs to be for the use of the player’s NIL in some business capacity by the sponsoring business. That’s it. Anything else that falls outside the lines of that is subject for review and if it’s found the NIL offer didn’t respect the confines of the rule structure then the player, school and company offering the NiL were all subject to sanctions as a result. It’s not rocket science here. I do think it’s interesting to see these collectives pop up. It basically validated that the bag of cash schools always existed. [/QUOTE]