IthacaBarrel
Shaky Potatoes
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 14,113
- Like
- 25,937
Three yards, cloud of pellets, hairy ears, white sneakers, members only jackets and coors lights for all.
front butts. don't forget the chris christie-esque front butts.Three yards, cloud of pellets, hairy ears, white sneakers, members only jackets and coors lights for all.
front butts. don't forget the chris christie-esque front butts.
does coyle have the stones to go against the meatheaded wishes of fat guys with moustaches who make up 98% of the people he'll talk to face to face?
we went outside the northeast for the AD, now we need to do it for the coach.
this will anger concussed fullbacks and hairy ears guys (thank you IB) with basic cable but they'll come around, they only know what they know and they need to be shown something different to understand
c'mon, i'm not suggesting that.So, what are you suggesting?
Coaches from the NE don't know how to coach offensive football?
I suggest that. I strongly suggest that.So, what are you suggesting?
Coaches from the NE don't know how to coach offensive football?
Boise, Eugene and Pullman are all very grim places in winter. And they don't have domes.
i don't think it's just weather although that's a big part of it. there is something cultural about it. lots of tough guys in the northeast.South Bend is at the bottom of Lake Michigan where the weather can be a lot like our weather. I'm pretty sure that Columbus and Ann Arbor get pretty cold in the winter. I suspect that same is true in Lincoln, Nebraska and Iowa City, Iowa. I agree that we don't have a monopoly on bad weather.
So, what are you suggesting?
Coaches from the NE don't know how to coach offensive football?
i don't think it's just weather although that's a big part of it. there is something cultural about it. lots of tough guys in the northeast.
OrangePA said:[ I have to say, for a guy who dismisses anecdotal/observational data, you seem to be advancing a geographically and culturally-based measure of offensive football strategy. I'm very surprised.
It's not anecdotal to look at the results and schemes. I'm just trying to explain why those results are so bad[
I have to say, for a guy who dismisses anecdotal/observational data, you seem to be advancing a geographically and culturally-based measure of offensive football strategy.
I'm very surprised.
It's not anecdotal to look at the results and schemes. I'm just trying to explain why those results are so bad
Kinda. I have a spectacularly offensive theory that I think nails it but I'm keeping it to myselfSo, the schemes and results having nothing to do with talent level, recruiting budgets, or access to athletes?
It's NE "culture"??
You mean in Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse we believe that real men play football by running the ball between the tackles?
Kinda. I have a spectacularly offensive theory that I think nails it but I'm keeping it to myself

Often times stats point to these type answers. Data is still the data. NE football has severe offensive issues.
Kinda. I have a spectacularly offensive theory that I think nails it but I'm keeping it to myself
front butts. don't forget the chris christie-esque front butts.
Kinda. I have a spectacularly offensive theory that I think nails it but I'm keeping it to myself
albanycuse would hunt me down if i shared it, capeesh?You can't drop that kind of teaser and then not share.
if i had a nickel for everytime I heard that, I wouldn't have a nickelCan someone explain to me how Syracuse was the offensive laboratory of college football in the 90s then?
We need someone to do a dissertation on this topic?
After the Babers announcement I figured it would be interesting bump this thread and list the specialty for each team's head coach:52. Navy
67. UMass
77. Pitt
83. Rutgers
87. Maryland
95. Temple
108. Penn State
111. Army
119. Syracuse
120. UConn
126. BC