- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,475
- Like
- 197,230
Works for me, sign me up.
Low pay and late nights.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Works for me, sign me up.
Because it can't be good. Doesn't mean it is bad, just like I have said. Nobody here either has said we are losing any commits. No idea what it means at all, but its not a good thing. First it was TMZ now NYPost. Maybe you should be the editor here and everything go through you.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Good point. I remember when Gause visited us late during a recruiting weekend and the commotion that caused.Oh give me a break. It's no different than saying players A, B, C were at SU. Both are factual. Unless you think negative facts shouldn't be posted. And yea, I posted it just to rile people up. Ridiculous post.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
I believe that above is the most important point...8 commits through mid October...according to ESPN recruiting Rutgers, Uconn, Pitt, NCState, BC are all pushing or exceeding 20 commits at this time (these are examples only and there are many more commit classes pushing 20 or more from the BE and ACC)...so the question is: HOW CAN 'CUSE HAVE ONLY 8 (this isnt bball where if we only get one this year not a major problem) BUT THE FOOTBALL TEAM NEEDS A MAJOR INFUSION...and the coaching staff does not seem to be doing a good job in this area...what do you think????It's mid-October and SU has 8 verbals and some of those are wavering. Unless they go on a tear, recruiting could well go into the crapper. I would term that "sky crashing down on their heads."
I believe that above is the most important point...8 commits through mid October...according to ESPN recruiting Rutgers, Uconn, Pitt, NCState, BC are all pushing or exceeding 20 commits at this time (these are examples only and there are many more commit classes pushing 20 or more from the BE and ACC)...so the question is: HOW CAN 'CUSE HAVE ONLY 8 (this isnt bball where if we only get one this year not a major problem) BUT THE FOOTBALL TEAM NEEDS A MAJOR INFUSION...and the coaching staff does not seem to be doing a good job in this area...what do you think????
Our turnovers have caused a 66 point swing so far this year. Average of 11 points a game. If we were simply turnover neutral we would be 5-1, with a shot at 6-0.
Sounds pretty alarmist to me. I don't get the feeling you like this coach very much.Because it can't be good. Doesn't mean it is bad, just like I have said. Nobody here either has said we are losing any commits. No idea what it means at all, but its not a good thing. First it was TMZ now NYPost. Maybe you should be the editor here and everything go through you.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Losing a home game to Uconn would certainly qualify. Losing a road game to the 20th ranked team in the country, not so much.
As far as the recruits, those guys aren't going anywhere.
Nope, one more. You get to play early.The only two things we have over Rutgers are History and the ACC.
That's a great stat, but it's time to face the fact that that is who we are - a team that consistently turns the ball over and shoots itself in the foot. We are quite adept at quickly reloading the pistol for the next shot.Our turnovers have caused a 66 point swing so far this year. Average of 11 points a game. If we were simply turnover neutral we would be 5-1, with a shot at 6-0.
But, but, but, the ACC...
Maybe HCDM should give up ST duties and double down on keeping those guys.
Sounds pretty alarmist to me. I don't get the feeling you like this coach very much.