Not necessarily...ND just might play 6 ACC games in those years to retain playing games in NJ.The Metlife/ND games will still happen and those games will count as one of the 5 ND plays against the ACC.
Kiss strong Dome attendance good bye for good.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Kiss strong Dome attendance good bye for good.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
VT, Miami, Clemson, UMD, BC, Pitt, NCSU, GT, UVa, etc not good enough for you guys?
Any program they get will be one that has no interest in playing on our campus.
The arms race never ends.
Just so I'm clear... If SU was good and had a schedule some season with Dome games against, say, a top 5 FSU team and a top 15 NC State team, people in CNY would not go, because SU 2 year earlier played a "home" game at MetLife against ND?
I just want to understand this.
Probably not. SU continues on their decade or more run if saying they don't care about Dome attendance nor the fans.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
They aren't all in the same year. We've gone thru this before. Plus in any single year, some of those teams won't be any good.
Btw, wasn't USC good enough fir you guys?
Also, I have no doubt good teams would come to the Dome. They play at other schools home fields, like we have also discussed before.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Bees, seriously, what do you want? Forget the USC/MetLife thing for a minute. Besides having a much better football team for the past decade, what should SU be doing? They play in a stadium where every seat is good, and tickets are reasonably priced. Parking can be a hassle, but life ain't perfect. I just don't get it.
When I was a kid I went to watch crappy Pats games in a joke of a stadium where it would take 2 hours to exit the parking lot after the game. But it was a fun day.
I honestly don't know what you want SU to do?
When I get the time, I'll give you a list of things SU has done that says screw the fan, especially the real diehards.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Don't you guys me, it's honestly easier for me to get to SU than to the Meadowlands. I95 is the road of death.
We have discussed it, the payday to go to SU stinks. Our hoops team doesn't travel to bandboxes to play either.
The Dome needs to blow up their pricing scheme and start over. You feel like you're getting screwed yet you can slap a beachball over and hit a guy who's getting a huge deal.
When I say you guys, I don't mean you personally and probably nobody on this board. You guys is a general statement for the alumni.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
The party line out of the school is that the money is too good and the player dig it and it helps recruiting.
All things being equal I'd just as soon see them do what you want. With the ACC I'll get to see SU sports much much more. But if they get a game that is a big deal that they would not otherwise get I can see the rationale. Frankly I think the stadium is way too big and it's just a huge bowl in a parking lot. Would rather see them play in a venue that looks better than that.
The party line.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Kiss strong Dome attendance good bye for good.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Source/link?
Has anyone clarified whether the last sentence applies to both of the ones before it, or only the prior one?http://blog.syracuse.com/sports/2012/09/syracuse_ad_daryl_gross_reacts.html
"Syracuse already has four games against Notre Dame in the near future. In 2014 and 2016, Notre Dame will play Syracuse at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, N.J. In 2015 and 2017, Notre Dame will host Syracuse in South Bend, Ind. Those games are likely to count toward the 5-game agreement."
Has anyone clarified whether the last sentence applies to both of the ones before it, or only the prior one?
Regardless, it presents logistical issues if they plan to get right into the play each team every three years schedule, as SU would be taking other ACC teams spots. And would be giving up Dome-field advantage either way. Not sure on the # of games in the other deals ND has with Pitt and BC (or if they have other games already lined up with other ACC teams), but those would factor in as well. Doubt it will fly on Tobacco Road if the northern schools (including two new ones) keep 3/5 of the ND games during the first several years of the agreement.
There is also the issue of how it will be split up. Five games a year with each team playing them every three years works great if the ACC was a 15 team conference, but there are only 14 teams:
Year 1: ND at teams 1,2 and hosting teams 3,4,5
Year 2: ND at teams 6,7,8 and hosting teams 9,10
Year 3: ND at teams 11,12 and hosting teams 13,14, and who?
The devil is in the details and once they look at all the details, I think it's highly unlikely that they'll be able to begin the rotation with a straight distribution of games - which will prompt all kinds of people to overreact/accuse them of renegging like the BE handshake deal/etc. Factor in the potential of them ultimately joining the conference and the savvy schools will ensure that they get their home games in early in the sequence.