LOL Did you just say that Nova plays in a better league? LOL How about that other thing.. you know the head to head bashing syracuse gave Nova.Nova is 5-3 against RPI top 50.
Cuse is 6-2.
Nova is 23-0 against teams outside of the RPI top 50.
Cuse is 20-2, with both losses to teams at home outside of the top 100 RPI.
Nova's RPI is 4.
Cuse's RPI is 12.
Nova's nonconference SOS is #49, with overall strength being #21.
Cuse's nonconference SOS is #110, with overall strength being #66.
Nova plays in a better conference and has 3 losses. Cuse has 4 losses.
The answer is clear as day.
This shouldn't be hard to understand.LOL Did you just say that Nova plays in a better league? LOL How about that other thing.. you know the head to head bashing syracuse gave Nova.
you showed us. good luck with your future endeavors.This shouldn't be hard to understand.
Big East is #4 in RPI, below only the Big 12, Big 10, and PAC-12. ACC is at #5, right behind them.
Also, teams are judged by overall body of work, not head to head matchups.
Please do your research next time.
Don't get me wrong, I would love to be a 2 in a bracket with Nova as a 1. Just beat the 3 and it's a cake walk to the final four, again. But Nova still has another @ss kicking coming from the big C so we both know that Nova as a 1 is a joke. Congrats on breaking the 30 year drought for regular season Big East champs though. I wonder what changed for you?? Oh, I know. All the good teams left.This shouldn't be hard to understand.
Big East is #4 in RPI, below only the Big 12, Big 10, and PAC-12. ACC is at #5, right behind them.
Also, teams are judged by overall body of work, not head to head matchups.
Please do your research next time.
Us? Lol.you showed us. good luck with your future endeavors.
duhu said:This shouldn't be hard to understand.
Big East is #4 in RPI, below only the Big 12, Big 10, and PAC-12. ACC is at #5, right behind them.
Also, teams are judged by overall body of work, not head to head matchups.
Please do your research next time.
Really, the last 1 seed is going to be weak.Don't get me wrong, I would love to be a 2 in a bracket with Nova as a 1. Just beat the 3 and it's a cake walk to the final four, again. But Nova still has another @ss kicking coming from the big C so we both know that Nova as a 1 is a joke. Congrats on breaking the 30 year drought for regular season Big East champs though. I wonder what changed for you?? Oh, I know. All the good teams left.
would you put the big east top 4 against the acc top 4 and still talk about rpi? nova, Creighton, providence and Xavier versus Syracuse, duke, unc, and Virginia?Us? Lol.
I thought I was responding to only one person.
Oh, to be clear, you are on a syracuse fan board. I know that Nova doesn't have enough fans to have a board of their own. Come here any time. I heard that the Big East Tournament isn't even sold out. LOLUs? Lol.
I thought I was responding to only one person.
Sure you don't. You are a syracuse fan, right? With your 36 posts and all. Once again, feel free to stay. You don't have a board of your own.Us? Lol.
I thought I was responding to only one person.
Overall body of work. Not one game.So beating team by 16 after spotting them 18 means nothing? Ok. Who has Nova beaten to make you so worthy of a #1?
This is all moot since Creighton will embarrass them for a 3rd time.
The committee puts no stock on the last 10 games. That was ended about 7 years ago. Do some researchOverall body of work. Not one game.
And I don't think the committee puts any stock into what the score was for a game at a specific point in time. Rather, they place the most emphasis in SOS, RPI, Strong wins (particularly away from home) vs Bad losses, overall winning percentage and how the team has played in it's last 10 games.
The committee puts no stock on the last 10 games. That was ended about 7 years ago. Do some researchOverall body of work. Not one game.
And I don't think the committee puts any stock into what the score was for a game at a specific point in time. Rather, they place the most emphasis in SOS, RPI, Strong wins (particularly away from home) vs Bad losses, overall winning percentage and how the team has played in it's last 10 games.
You lost all credibility, whatever there was, with your last 10 words of this post.Overall body of work. Not one game.
And I don't think the committee puts any stock into what the score was for a game at a specific point in time. Rather, they place the most emphasis in SOS, RPI, Strong wins (particularly away from home) vs Bad losses, overall winning percentage and how the team has played in it's last 10 games.
duhu said:Overall body of work. Not one game.
And I don't think the committee puts any stock into what the score was for a game at a specific point in time. Rather, they place the most emphasis in SOS, RPI, Strong wins (particularly away from home) vs Bad losses, overall winning percentage and how the team has played in it's last 10 games.
Thanks. I edited to 10 which was what I meant.The 19th word was "from" that was in the middle of a parenthetical statements.