NY Times article ranking 40 years of NCAA Tournament champions | Syracusefan.com

NY Times article ranking 40 years of NCAA Tournament champions

IMO 2010 Duke was one of the worst Champs ever. Ranking them 18th is a joke. The teams they beat were a complete joke in a really down year overall.

2024 UConn #1 is also a joke. Yes, they were the best team and dominant vs their competition, but that team doesn't beat half the other champs. Which brings up the fallacy of these rankings. Dominating in a weak year with no super star players and playing a bunch of low seeds shouldn't trump being a 3 seed in a loaded year with super star players running through a bunch of high seeds.
 
Methodology usually can be criticized.
The Orange(men) '03 don't seem to gain much by tying for 5th in the ranking of seeds beaten category.

'85 'Nova's run is really highlighted by how many top seeds they beat: two #2's and two #1's!
Incredible.
Yet they are ranked at the bottom of the list.
 
We were one blocked shot away from losing in 2003. I am happy to be in this company! :)
 
Methodology usually can be criticized.
The Orange(men) '03 don't seem to gain much by tying for 5th in the ranking of seeds beaten category.

'85 'Nova's run is really highlighted by how many top seeds they beat: two #2's and two #1's!
Incredible.
Yet they are ranked at the bottom of the list.

I get Nova because of their seeding. A 1 seed vs an 8 seed is a big gap. However a 1 vs a 3 is splitting hairs.

I think the ranking didn't take enough account of who you beat and the players that you had.

Last year's UConn team was dominate all year, but would a UConn fan really say that team was better than all of their other championship teams?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
172,368
Messages
5,013,762
Members
6,026
Latest member
Upstate33

Online statistics

Members online
207
Guests online
1,437
Total visitors
1,644


...
Top Bottom