…in the last four games. Do I have that right?
13, 14, 16, 18 made 3s.
That’s….something. Sry, but 4 teams in a row don’t just “get hot” from three.
44cuse
…in the last four games. Do I have that right?
13, 14, 16, 18 made 3s.
That’s….something. Sry, but 4 teams in a row don’t just “get hot” from three.
44cuse
I don't think you get any argument on that. JB wants everyone chucking threes. Now that everyone can make them, we have no answers. And it seems like players have quit…in the last four games. Do I have that right?
13, 14, 16, 18 made 3s.
That’s….something. Sry, but 4 teams in a row don’t just “get hot” from three.
44cuse
Exactly. And I just don’t understand why Wildhack is silent on this. It’s like business as usual on the hill when we are just getting smoked because JB is JB. Eventually the math will work out for us. Well, guess what? The math has changed.I don't think you get any argument on that. JB wants everyone chucking threes. Now that everyone can make them, we have no answers. And it seems like players have quit
Maybe this stretch is enough to convince jb, I think it'll take a truly bad record overall to do it but all it will take is one year with a bad record and he'll call it a day. That's my criteria. You don't get rid of a legend when his record isn't bad. It frustrates the hell out of people here that there is a long decline with a floor of .500 give or take.Exactly. And I just don’t understand why Wildhack is silent on this. It’s like business as usual on the hill when we are just getting smoked because JB is JB. Eventually the math will work out for us. Well, guess what? The math has changed.
Either get better players (for your system) or adjust your system. Either way, it’s in the coach.
44cuse
…in the last four games. Do I have that right?
13, 14, 16, 18 made 3s.
That’s….something. Sry, but 4 teams in a row don’t just “get hot” from three.
44cuse
If the ACC hadn’t been historically weak the last couple seasons we would have seen that bad record you speak of. JB has been fortunate that the conference that normally is ranked 2nd or 3rd in strength has been 6th or 7th.Maybe this stretch is enough to convince jb, I think it'll take a truly bad record overall to do it but all it will take is one year with a bad record and he'll call it a day. That's my criteria. You don't get rid of a legend when his record isn't bad. It frustrates the hell out of people here that there is a long decline with a floor of .500 give or take.
Crum got canned after his second 12 win season
If the ACC hadn’t been historically weak the last couple seasons we would have seen that bad record you speak of. JB has been fortunate that the conference that normally is ranked 2nd or 3rd in strength has been 6th or 7th.
Just an unprecedented stretch of playing some of the best teams against a zone in history. I don't think we've ever seen anything like this. We may never see it again in our lifetimes.
Effortits around 1% that 61/143 would occur based on the rest of the season's 33.2%. the other side would be, what tangibly changed to lead to an increase in 3pt%
Agree but i wouldn't factor that in if I were wildsackIf the ACC hadn’t been historically weak the last couple seasons we would have seen that bad record you speak of. JB has been fortunate that the conference that normally is ranked 2nd or 3rd in strength has been 6th or 7th.
Opponents have 104 assists in 4 games...Also, 104 assists on 131 field goals made by the last 4 opponents. That’s what you call shredding the zone
…in the last four games. Do I have that right?
13, 14, 16, 18 made 3s.
That’s….something. Sry, but 4 teams in a row don’t just “get hot” from three.
44cuse
They just need to practice the 2-3 zone more in practice. Probably have spent too much time on offense the last month or so.
This isn’t a zone problem. Not entirely or even mostly. It’s an effort problem.
That isn’t to say the zone didn’t contribute. It’s been bad this year and has been lit up, but not like this across multiple games. This indicates something else contributing in a big way.