Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Knicks411, post: 1737869, member: 767"] Certainly in hindsight it cost him, I'm just saying at the time the contract wasn't seen as a ridiculous underpay or anything. If anything, maybe the opposite. Just for some color [URL]http://thebiglead.com/2015/12/03/stephen-curry-ankle-warriors/[/URL] Would Steph have been eligible for the Rose deal? Not on his first deal I don't think. And i don't think it applies to deals after that? Not sure The Davis thing is so weird; the writers are basically going to decide if he gets an extra $25 million. [/QUOTE]