Would think so. If it wasn't a serious consideration, he'd have discounted it right then.
I agree. I remember reading an article recently about the death penalty at SMU and how its effects were so severe that the NCAA more or less decided they would never do it again. They had intended to punish the program, but what happened was essentially an erasure of the program for a decade. I don't expect them to apply it to PSU, but I wish they would. Here, their intent should be to erase the program for a period of time. PSU would recover more quickly than SMU did, but it would still be helpful for PSU not to play football at even a respectable level for a while.While I think they deserve the death penalty, I think you are correct.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk 2
Public opinion as well as the opinion leaders like Costas are together very hard to ignore. The outrage over ignoring this or brushing it aside on some hair-splitting technicality is too much for the NCAA to take. They have to do something. Once that Rubicon is crossed it has to be more severe than USC. Whether or not they have the guts to invoke the death penalty or not is hard to tell.
There is certainly an argument that to be fair to USC, OSU, Miami etc, something has to be done. NCAA can;'t have a double standard in the favor of PSU on this one. Wonder is Vegas has a line on this.
I'll just keep repeating...it'll be a disgrace if the NCAA *has* to do this.
Penn State should be applying the death penalty to themselves.
I'll just keep repeating...it'll be a disgrace if the NCAA *has* to do this.
Penn State should be applying the death penalty to themselves.