jgeorge322
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2011
- Messages
- 10,089
- Like
- 17,617
Not really.Just to throw a little bit of gasoline on the dumpster fire, we held them to 26 points in bball, allowing only 8 points in the second half. I'm surprised the author didn't mention that. However, the Rutgers administration will be sad about all this right up until the time the B1G's check clears.
Way to go Rutgers! I'd bet our first two years in the ACC blow them out of the water in all those sports, even CFB. Our first year was about as good as theirs (no research - just guessing).
Real quick, I think our conference records the last two years are:
Year 1: 74-66
Year 2: 41-80
Quick conclusion: Our women's sports are a dumpsterfire this year - 24-60 in the ACC.
i just checked the schedules of all sports on cuse.com
men were 46-28-1
women were 101-15-14
total is 147-143-15 total for this year and some of our best team's (lax) are still playing.
this doesn't take into account we had good cross country teams.
where are you getting your numbers?
(edit: you did conference numbers only)
Yep, I pulled the conference numbers from the ACC website.
Not getting good value for the money from some of those teams this year-especially volleyball and softball.
I believe that they only get partial pay for a few years.Just to throw a little bit of gasoline on the dumpster fire, we held them to 26 points in bball, allowing only 8 points in the second half. I'm surprised the author didn't mention that. However, the Rutgers administration will be sad about all this right up until the time the B1G's check clears.
its so unusual and unexpected to see jersy state doing bad at sports and the major sports at that-
the way they dominated the big east for decades you would have expected them to vie for multiple championships from the start- after all its the reason they got in the big