bothsocksup
Starter
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,503
- Like
- 1,120
The line is opening up at 10...me? Im taking the over
Under. And SU needs to win. SU is a better team, at home.The line is opening up at 10...me? Im taking the over
Oh it's the coaches who hyped him? Are you saying they aren't good evaluators of talent and potential?0, and I've seen nothing in his limited play to make me all that upset if that's the case.
If the coaches hasn't hyped him up I doubt anyone would really care.
He's the Mookie Jones of SU football.
Oh it's the coaches who hyped him? Are you saying they aren't good evaluators of talent and potential?
Im sure OP didn't mean QB snaps. He meant touchesIf you set the over/under at 1, I'd still take the under.
AB isn't quarterbacking this team until the bottom completely and totally falls out on the season.
they couldn't be more different. jones has a narrow obvious skill but doesn't look the part at all. broyld's versatile and looks the part more than anyone we've had in years.0, and I've seen nothing in his limited play to make me all that upset if that's the case.
If the coaches hasn't hyped him up I doubt anyone would really care.
He's the Mookie Jones of SU football.
they couldn't be more different. jones has a narrow obvious skill but doesn't look the part at all. broyld's versatile and looks the part more than anyone we've had in years.
paul harris would be a better comparison if harris weren't so limited by his height.
the only way you could ignore his greatness in high school is if he's clearly physically limited. (like jones) there aren't any physical limitations
guy looks like he was created in a lab, he has moves, and he threw and ran for a million yards. guys who only watch the nfl might holler that if you superimpose his throwing motion on marinos, it's not as good. i hope he gets a shot next year.Yeah, I was just comparing them because both football and hoops fanbases are always clamoring for a guy who never plays, that's all.
I don't watch HS football nor do I follow recruiting much, so I really don't have an opinion on the guy.
guy looks like he was created in a lab, he has moves, and he threw and ran for a million yards. guys who only watch the nfl might holler that if you superimpose his throwing motion on marinos, it's not as good. i hope he gets a shot next year.
The thing with Broyld that pisses me off, is is they weren't not going to use him this year, why not work him at QB for a year? I don't get it... Now he is just waffling with no position. Kid they get a position and let him grow into it.. He would be tough to take down for sure.. I saw him throw in high school plenty, he looked at least aqequate. I don't think the kid is a wr or a rb but he is a hell of an athlete but right now he had no position.
What is he learning now? How to play with no position? Funny
i can live with a short term long term tradeoff if you get something in the short term. ok we're stunting his growth as a qb a little but that's fine because he's helping in the hybrid role.
if you're not going to get something short term, have him get ready to play QB.
It doesn't happen everywhere.Something just seems really off to me. Maybe this stuff happens everywhere, who knows.