Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="blizz, post: 947654, member: 4252"] Sounds to me like you just did... And yes, that's exactly where I would go with that thought. Add me to the list of people who think even entertaining this as an option is absurd. The details of the proposed rule make it clear that this is a thinly veiled attempt at guaranteeing defenses the ability to change personnel packages at any time, negating a designed advantage of spread style offenses. You have to love the signalling though, "I can't beat innovation on the field" is what I'm reading into it. But don't despair, it'll take a few years but someone will come up with something equally innovative that will change the game and they'll change the rules even faster. [/QUOTE]