Perspective - Wash Post Article Today on College Athletics

[VirginiaOrange]

So little respect for SU that it was not even included in the ACC chart despite Pitt and Louisville being in there.

Look at the revenues at Oregon, Texas, Alabama, Michigan, etc. Then throw in millions from boosters. Then decide where the good football coaches are going to end up.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/sports/wp/2015/11/23/running-up-the-bills/

 

[JJReddawg]

So little respect for SU that it was not even included in the ACC chart despite Pitt and Louisville being in there.

Look at the revenues at Oregon, Texas, Alabama, Michigan, etc. Then throw in millions from boosters. Then decide where the good football coaches are going to end up.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/sports/wp/2015/11/23/running-up-the-bills/

It doesn't appear that any private schools are included, as their numbers aren't public record.

 

[GoSU96]

So little respect for SU that it was not even included in the ACC chart despite Pitt and Louisville being in there.

Look at the revenues at Oregon, Texas, Alabama, Michigan, etc. Then throw in millions from boosters. Then decide where the good football coaches are going to end up.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/sports/wp/2015/11/23/running-up-the-bills/

With the same starting data SU had the fourth highest gross revenue in the ACC at $87.2M.

Their methodology was to dig through the source reports and make adjustments to get to an apples to apples number.

In the ACC the average decrement was $13M from the schools they reported. Ranges from FSU with a $25M reduction to GT with $4M. FSU also reported the highest gross, GT 13th.

Assuming SU follows in line with those numbers it would be $70M to $75M range adjusted revenue.