Zelda Zonk
2022 Iggy Winner: ACC Tourney Record
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 11,250
- Like
- 27,789
Personally, i wasn't thrilled that he was coaching the Bigs, but that had nothing to do with my expectations of him as a head coach.
Can we talk about Bernie? There has long been the 'legend' that Bernie was a "great" bigs coach. But, how do we ever really know that? We had 'testimony' from Rony Seikaly at some point. But how valid is that? Rony came from Greece, with little HS basketball experience. Then we had him. Then he played for an NBA team before telling someone that Bernie was the best bigs coach he had ever had. What the hell does that even mean? When would he have had a frame of reference?
So, then we had Derrick Coleman, who needed no Bernie to be amazing. So, what's the evidence? That Bernie had some association with Pete Newell camps?
The thing is, we can only know what the players did, not what they might have done under someone else. I don't have a great sense of our centers progressing in certain characteristics/skills. I remember Etan had paddles for hands, and he did become pretty good. Otis Hill became pretty good. McNeil and Forth were limited and didn't develop into what i hoped. Onuaku and Rick were really good. Terrence and Watkins were never what i hoped. Fab... is difficult to discuss. He became a force, but how much of that was due to coaching, and how much due to his raw athleticism and growing into the game?
You take all of those guys, and after DC, only Etan had an NBA career, and that wasn't exactly stellar. Onuaku perhaps could have, with better knees(?), but he didn't. Fab didn't have the head. That's 30 years with only two real NBA centers. Surely the college game is different, and it's not SU's responsibility to train a kid to be an NBA player, but there is some correlation to excellence in college and viability in the NBA.
People have said that my wish for an actual big to coach our bigs is unnecessary. That most other schools also have ex-guards as bigs coaches. But, my question is this: if we have been underperforming in this area, why wouldn't it be a good idea to go further than the norm? At least as far as the optics are concerned, toward attracting recruits.